NRGYF
Price
$0.07
Change
+$0.02 (+40.00%)
Updated
May 22 closing price
Capitalization
1.03M
TRBMF
Price
$0.05
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Jun 13 closing price
Capitalization
48.29M
Interact to see
Advertisement

NRGYF vs TRBMF

Header iconNRGYF vs TRBMF Comparison
Open Charts NRGYF vs TRBMFBanner chart's image
New Energy Metals
Price$0.07
Change+$0.02 (+40.00%)
Volume$100
Capitalization1.03M
Torq Resources
Price$0.05
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$1.2K
Capitalization48.29M
NRGYF vs TRBMF Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
NRGYF vs. TRBMF commentary
Jun 15, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NRGYF is a Hold and TRBMF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jun 15, 2025
Stock price -- (NRGYF: $0.07 vs. TRBMF: $0.05)
Brand notoriety: NRGYF and TRBMF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Other Metals/Minerals industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: NRGYF: 11% vs. TRBMF: 2%
Market capitalization -- NRGYF: $1.03M vs. TRBMF: $48.29M
NRGYF [@Other Metals/Minerals] is valued at $1.03M. TRBMF’s [@Other Metals/Minerals] market capitalization is $48.29M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Other Metals/Minerals] industry ranges from $223.12B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Other Metals/Minerals] industry is $3.05B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

NRGYF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileTRBMF’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • NRGYF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • TRBMF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, TRBMF is a better buy in the long-term than NRGYF.

Price Growth

NRGYF (@Other Metals/Minerals) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while TRBMF (@Other Metals/Minerals) price change was -7.09% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Other Metals/Minerals industry was +3.32%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +12.67%, and the average quarterly price growth was +29.24%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Other Metals/Minerals (+3.32% weekly)

The category includes companies that explore for, mine and extract metals, such as copper, diamonds, nickel, cobalt ore, lead, zinc and uranium. BHP, Rio Tinto and Southern Copper Corporation are major players in this space.

FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
TRBMF($48.3M) has a higher market cap than NRGYF($1.03M). NRGYF YTD gains are higher at: 388.533 vs. TRBMF (39.617). NRGYF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): -683.31K vs. TRBMF (-13.86M). TRBMF has more cash in the bank: 14.3M vs. NRGYF (612K). NRGYF (0) and TRBMF (0) have equivalent revenues.
NRGYFTRBMFNRGYF / TRBMF
Capitalization1.03M48.3M2%
EBITDA-683.31K-13.86M5%
Gain YTD388.53339.617981%
P/E Ratio22.78N/A-
Revenue00-
Total Cash612K14.3M4%
Total DebtN/A2.04M-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
TRBMF: Fundamental Ratings
TRBMF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
50
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
60
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100
SMR RATING
1..100
100
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
42
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
100
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
65

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
RSI
ODDS (%)
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Momentum
ODDS (%)
MACD
ODDS (%)
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Advances
ODDS (%)
Declines
ODDS (%)
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Aroon
ODDS (%)
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
TCVIX22.85-0.26
-1.13%
Touchstone Mid Cap Value Inst
EXTGX53.93-0.67
-1.23%
Eaton Vance Tx-Mgd Growth 1.2 A
STSOX32.03-0.42
-1.29%
Sterling Capital SmCp Val C
TILWX28.80-0.43
-1.47%
Nuveen Large Cap Growth W
RYMDX122.51-2.92
-2.33%
Rydex Mid-Cap 1.5x Strategy H

NRGYF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that NRGYF and NBMFF have been poorly correlated (+30% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that NRGYF and NBMFF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To NRGYF
1D Price
Change %
NRGYF100%
N/A
NBMFF - NRGYF
30%
Poorly correlated
+1.65%
SPODF - NRGYF
27%
Poorly correlated
N/A
CVWFF - NRGYF
27%
Poorly correlated
N/A
EUUNF - NRGYF
26%
Poorly correlated
N/A
TRBMF - NRGYF
25%
Poorly correlated
-4.22%
More

TRBMF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that TRBMF and NKGFF have been poorly correlated (+29% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that TRBMF and NKGFF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To TRBMF
1D Price
Change %
TRBMF100%
-4.22%
NKGFF - TRBMF
29%
Poorly correlated
-1.60%
AAGFF - TRBMF
26%
Poorly correlated
+0.30%
NRGYF - TRBMF
25%
Poorly correlated
N/A
FMCXF - TRBMF
22%
Poorly correlated
-1.96%
CSCCF - TRBMF
22%
Poorly correlated
-2.46%
More