Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
NRGSX vs WTSGX
NRGSX vs WTSGX Comparison
Open Charts NRGSX vs WTSGX
Neuberger Berman Genesis R6
Price$62.80
Change+$0.25 (+0.40%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets8.71B
Segall Bryant & Hamill Small Cap Gr Ret
Price$21.70
Change-$0.09 (-0.41%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets277.28M
NRGSX vs WTSGX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
NRGSX vs. WTSGX commentary
Oct 19, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NRGSX is a Hold and WTSGX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NRGSX has more cash in the bank: 8.71B vs. WTSGX (277M). NRGSX pays higher dividends than WTSGX: NRGSX (0.06) vs WTSGX (0.00). NRGSX was incepted earlier than WTSGX: NRGSX (13 years) vs WTSGX (12 years). WTSGX (1.04) is less costly to investors than NRGSX (0.74). WTSGX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 46.00 vs. NRGSX (13.00). NRGSX has a lower initial minimum investment than WTSGX: NRGSX (0) vs WTSGX (2500). WTSGX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 1.78 vs. NRGSX (-10.12). WTSGX return over 5 years is better than : 26.60 vs. NRGSX (-2.32).
| NRGSX | WTSGX | NRGSX / WTSGX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.74 | 1.04 | 71% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.74 | 1.04 | 71% |
| Fund Existence | 13 years | 12 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -3.902 | 2.746 | -142% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 2500 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 8.71B | 277M | 3,146% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.06 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -10.12 | 1.78 | -568% |
| Returns for 3 years | 5.90 | 43.42 | 14% |
| Returns for 5 years | -2.32 | 26.60 | -9% |
| Returns for 10 years | 10.24 | 113.79 | 9% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers