Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
NRGSX vs WRGCX
NRGSX vs WRGCX Comparison
Open Charts NRGSX vs WRGCX
Neuberger Berman Genesis R6
Price$62.80
Change+$0.25 (+0.40%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets8.71B
Macquarie Small Cap Growth C
Price$21.19
Change-$0.11 (-0.52%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.09B
NRGSX vs WRGCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
NRGSX vs. WRGCX commentary
Oct 19, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NRGSX is a Hold and WRGCX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NRGSX has more cash in the bank: 8.71B vs. WRGCX (1.09B). NRGSX pays higher dividends than WRGCX: NRGSX (0.06) vs WRGCX (0.00). NRGSX was incepted earlier than WRGCX: NRGSX (13 years) vs WRGCX (33 years). WRGCX (2.04) is less costly to investors than NRGSX (0.74). WRGCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 76.00 vs. NRGSX (13.00). NRGSX has a lower initial minimum investment than WRGCX: NRGSX (0) vs WRGCX (1000). WRGCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -2.31 vs. NRGSX (-10.12). NRGSX return over 5 years is better than : -2.32 vs. WRGCX (-52.45).
| NRGSX | WRGCX | NRGSX / WRGCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.74 | 1.88 | 39% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.74 | 2.04 | 36% |
| Fund Existence | 13 years | 33 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -3.902 | 9.679 | -40% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 1000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 8.71B | 1.09B | 797% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.06 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -10.12 | -2.31 | 439% |
| Returns for 3 years | 5.90 | 0.33 | 1,781% |
| Returns for 5 years | -2.32 | -52.45 | 4% |
| Returns for 10 years | 10.24 | -53.27 | -19% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement