Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
NRGSX vs WRGCX
NRGSX vs WRGCX Comparison
Open Charts NRGSX vs WRGCX
Neuberger Berman Genesis R6
Price$63.48
Change+$0.48 (+0.76%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets8.89B
Macquarie Small Cap Growth C
Price$6.95
Change-$0.04 (-0.57%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.1B
NRGSX vs WRGCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
NRGSX vs. WRGCX commentary
Sep 28, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NRGSX is a Buy and WRGCX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NRGSX has more cash in the bank: 8.89B vs. WRGCX (1.1B). NRGSX pays higher dividends than WRGCX: NRGSX (0.06) vs WRGCX (0.00). NRGSX was incepted earlier than WRGCX: NRGSX (13 years) vs WRGCX (33 years). WRGCX (2.00) is less costly to investors than NRGSX (0.74). WRGCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 76.00 vs. NRGSX (13.00). NRGSX has a lower initial minimum investment than WRGCX: NRGSX (0) vs WRGCX (1000). WRGCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -2.25 vs. NRGSX (-6.97). NRGSX return over 5 years is better than : 7.76 vs. WRGCX (-47.74).
| NRGSX | WRGCX | NRGSX / WRGCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.74 | 1.88 | 39% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.74 | 2.00 | 37% |
| Fund Existence | 13 years | 33 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -2.862 | 7.919 | -36% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 1000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 8.89B | 1.1B | 808% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.06 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -6.97 | -2.25 | 310% |
| Returns for 3 years | 12.34 | 4.35 | 283% |
| Returns for 5 years | 7.76 | -47.74 | -16% |
| Returns for 10 years | 17.91 | -51.27 | -35% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement