Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
NRGSX vs WRGCX
NRGSX vs WRGCX Comparison
Open Charts NRGSX vs WRGCX
Neuberger Berman Genesis R6
Price$62.94
Change-$0.08 (-0.13%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets8.46B
Nomura Small Cap Growth C
Price$22.03
Change+$0.25 (+1.15%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.09B
NRGSX vs WRGCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
NRGSX vs. WRGCX commentary
Dec 04, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NRGSX is a Buy and WRGCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NRGSX has more cash in the bank: 8.46B vs. WRGCX (1.1B). NRGSX pays higher dividends than WRGCX: NRGSX (0.07) vs WRGCX (0.00). NRGSX was incepted earlier than WRGCX: NRGSX (13 years) vs WRGCX (33 years). WRGCX (2.04) is less costly to investors than NRGSX (0.74). WRGCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 76.00 vs. NRGSX (13.00). NRGSX has a lower initial minimum investment than WRGCX: NRGSX (0) vs WRGCX (1000). WRGCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -5.37 vs. NRGSX (-14.38). NRGSX return over 5 years is better than : -7.82 vs. WRGCX (-53.80).
| NRGSX | WRGCX | NRGSX / WRGCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.74 | 1.88 | 39% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.74 | 2.04 | 36% |
| Fund Existence | 13 years | 33 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -3.565 | 13.147 | -27% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 1000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 8.46B | 1.1B | 773% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.07 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -14.38 | -5.37 | 268% |
| Returns for 3 years | -2.58 | -0.46 | 567% |
| Returns for 5 years | -7.82 | -53.80 | 15% |
| Returns for 10 years | 7.54 | -53.36 | -14% |