Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
NRGSX vs WRGCX
NRGSX vs WRGCX Comparison
Open Charts NRGSX vs WRGCX
Neuberger Berman Genesis R6
Price$61.95
Change-$0.68 (-1.09%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets8.43B
Macquarie Small Cap Growth C
Price$21.14
Change-$0.76 (-3.47%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.07B
NRGSX vs WRGCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
NRGSX vs. WRGCX commentary
Nov 14, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NRGSX is a Hold and WRGCX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NRGSX has more cash in the bank: 8.43B vs. WRGCX (1.07B). NRGSX pays higher dividends than WRGCX: NRGSX (0.07) vs WRGCX (0.00). NRGSX was incepted earlier than WRGCX: NRGSX (13 years) vs WRGCX (33 years). WRGCX (2.04) is less costly to investors than NRGSX (0.74). WRGCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 76.00 vs. NRGSX (13.00). NRGSX has a lower initial minimum investment than WRGCX: NRGSX (0) vs WRGCX (1000). WRGCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -2.93 vs. NRGSX (-13.93). NRGSX return over 5 years is better than : -6.57 vs. WRGCX (-51.80).
| NRGSX | WRGCX | NRGSX / WRGCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.74 | 1.88 | 39% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.74 | 2.04 | 36% |
| Fund Existence | 13 years | 33 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -4.162 | 13.354 | -31% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 1000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 8.43B | 1.07B | 785% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.07 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -13.93 | -2.93 | 476% |
| Returns for 3 years | -1.73 | 0.97 | -179% |
| Returns for 5 years | -6.57 | -51.80 | 13% |
| Returns for 10 years | 10.77 | -51.96 | -21% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement