Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
NRGSX vs SBASX
NRGSX vs SBASX Comparison
Open Charts NRGSX vs SBASX
Segall Bryant &Hamill Small Cap Cre Ins
Price$13.34
Change+$0.49 (+3.81%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets101.87M
NRGSX vs SBASX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
NRGSX vs. SBASX commentary
Feb 05, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NRGSX is a Hold and SBASX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NRGSX has more cash in the bank: 8.49B vs. SBASX (102M). NRGSX pays higher dividends than SBASX: NRGSX (0.48) vs SBASX (0.15). NRGSX was incepted earlier than SBASX: NRGSX (13 years) vs SBASX (6 years). SBASX (1.13) is less costly to investors than NRGSX (0.74). SBASX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 40.00 vs. NRGSX (23.00). NRGSX has a lower initial minimum investment than SBASX: NRGSX (0) vs SBASX (250000). SBASX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 3.33 vs. NRGSX (-12.75). SBASX return over 5 years is better than : 3.52 vs. NRGSX (-23.10).
| NRGSX | SBASX | NRGSX / SBASX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.74 | 0.99 | 75% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.74 | 1.13 | 65% |
| Fund Existence | 13 years | 6 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 5.452 | 7.235 | 75% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 8.49B | 102M | 8,327% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.48 | 0.15 | 327% |
| Returns for 1 year | -12.75 | 3.33 | -383% |
| Returns for 3 years | -6.33 | 14.31 | -44% |
| Returns for 5 years | -23.10 | 3.52 | -656% |
| Returns for 10 years | 24.83 | N/A | - |