Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
NRGSX vs QLSGX
NRGSX vs QLSGX Comparison
Open Charts NRGSX vs QLSGX
Federated Hermes MDT Small Cap Growth R6
Price$32.32
Change-$0.20 (-0.62%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets607.71M
NRGSX vs QLSGX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
NRGSX vs. QLSGX commentary
Dec 27, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NRGSX is a StrongBuy and QLSGX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NRGSX has more cash in the bank: 8.21B vs. QLSGX (608M). NRGSX pays higher dividends than QLSGX: NRGSX (0.07) vs QLSGX (0.00). NRGSX was incepted earlier than QLSGX: NRGSX (13 years) vs QLSGX (10 years). QLSGX (1.02) is less costly to investors than NRGSX (0.74). QLSGX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 91.00 vs. NRGSX (23.00). NRGSX (0) and QLSGX (0) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. QLSGX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 13.63 vs. NRGSX (-17.12). QLSGX return over 5 years is better than : -2.19 vs. NRGSX (-21.07).
| NRGSX | QLSGX | NRGSX / QLSGX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.74 | 0.88 | 84% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.74 | 1.02 | 73% |
| Fund Existence | 13 years | 10 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -15.822 | 15.606 | -101% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 8.21B | 608M | 1,350% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.07 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -17.12 | 13.63 | -126% |
| Returns for 3 years | 1.26 | 60.87 | 2% |
| Returns for 5 years | -21.07 | -2.19 | 960% |
| Returns for 10 years | 7.95 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement