Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
NRGSX vs PQSAX
NRGSX vs PQSAX Comparison
Open Charts NRGSX vs PQSAX
Neuberger Berman Genesis R6
Price$62.80
Change+$0.25 (+0.40%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets8.71B
Virtus KAR Small-Cap Value A
Price$24.11
Change+$0.08 (+0.33%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets728.39M
NRGSX vs PQSAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
NRGSX vs. PQSAX commentary
Oct 21, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NRGSX is a Hold and PQSAX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NRGSX has more cash in the bank: 8.71B vs. PQSAX (728M). PQSAX pays higher dividends than NRGSX: PQSAX (0.48) vs NRGSX (0.06). NRGSX was incepted earlier than PQSAX: NRGSX (13 years) vs PQSAX (19 years). PQSAX (1.21) is less costly to investors than NRGSX (0.74). NRGSX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 13.00 vs. PQSAX (6.00). NRGSX has a lower initial minimum investment than PQSAX: NRGSX (0) vs PQSAX (2500). PQSAX (-9.97) and NRGSX (-10.12) have marching annual gain over last year. PQSAX return over 5 years is better than : 15.49 vs. NRGSX (-2.32).
| NRGSX | PQSAX | NRGSX / PQSAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.74 | 1.21 | 61% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.74 | 1.21 | 61% |
| Fund Existence | 13 years | 19 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -3.902 | -5.079 | 77% |
| Front Load | N/A | 6% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 2500 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 8.71B | 728M | 1,197% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.06 | 0.48 | 14% |
| Returns for 1 year | -10.12 | -9.97 | 101% |
| Returns for 3 years | 5.90 | 13.62 | 43% |
| Returns for 5 years | -2.32 | 15.49 | -15% |
| Returns for 10 years | 10.24 | 71.38 | 14% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement