Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
NRGSX vs OASGX
NRGSX vs OASGX Comparison
Open Charts NRGSX vs OASGX
Neuberger Berman Genesis R6
Price$62.80
Change+$0.25 (+0.40%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets8.68B
Optimum Small-Mid Cap Growth A
Price$12.35
Change-$0.04 (-0.32%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets729.49M
NRGSX vs OASGX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
NRGSX vs. OASGX commentary
Oct 18, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NRGSX is a Hold and OASGX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NRGSX has more cash in the bank: 8.69B vs. OASGX (729M). NRGSX pays higher dividends than OASGX: NRGSX (0.06) vs OASGX (0.00). NRGSX was incepted earlier than OASGX: NRGSX (13 years) vs OASGX (22 years). OASGX (1.54) is less costly to investors than NRGSX (0.74). OASGX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 131.00 vs. NRGSX (13.00). NRGSX has a lower initial minimum investment than OASGX: NRGSX (0) vs OASGX (1000). OASGX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 4.31 vs. NRGSX (-10.12). NRGSX return over 5 years is better than : -2.32 vs. OASGX (-27.65).
| NRGSX | OASGX | NRGSX / OASGX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.74 | 1.44 | 51% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.74 | 1.54 | 48% |
| Fund Existence | 13 years | 22 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -3.902 | 5.106 | -76% |
| Front Load | N/A | 6% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 1000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 8.69B | 729M | 1,191% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.06 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -10.12 | 4.31 | -235% |
| Returns for 3 years | 5.90 | 21.08 | 28% |
| Returns for 5 years | -2.32 | -27.65 | 8% |
| Returns for 10 years | 10.24 | -12.29 | -83% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers