Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
NRARX vs RWEBX
NRARX vs RWEBX Comparison
Open Charts NRARX vs RWEBX
Neuberger Berman Quality Equity R3
Price$52.64
Change+$0.18 (+0.34%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.92B
American Funds Washington Mutual R2E
Price$66.32
Change+$0.27 (+0.41%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets205.87B
NRARX vs RWEBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
NRARX vs. RWEBX commentary
Oct 19, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NRARX is a Buy and RWEBX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RWEBX has more cash in the bank: 206B vs. NRARX (1.92B). RWEBX pays higher dividends than NRARX: RWEBX (0.76) vs NRARX (0.00). NRARX was incepted earlier than RWEBX: NRARX (16 years) vs RWEBX (11 years). NRARX (1.32) is less costly to investors than RWEBX (1.06). RWEBX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 29.00 vs. NRARX (8.00). NRARX has a lower initial minimum investment than RWEBX: NRARX (0) vs RWEBX (250). NRARX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 7.52 vs. RWEBX (3.29). RWEBX return over 5 years is better than : 45.88 vs. NRARX (30.47).
| NRARX | RWEBX | NRARX / RWEBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.32 | 1.06 | 125% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.32 | 1.06 | 125% |
| Fund Existence | 16 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 8.828 | 9.079 | 97% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.92B | 206B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.76 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 7.52 | 3.29 | 229% |
| Returns for 3 years | 42.73 | 38.78 | 110% |
| Returns for 5 years | 30.47 | 45.88 | 66% |
| Returns for 10 years | 42.28 | 73.45 | 58% |