Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
NRACX vs RWMFX
NRACX vs RWMFX Comparison
Open Charts NRACX vs RWMFX
Neuberger Berman Quality Equity C
Price$50.78
Change+$0.29 (+0.57%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.93B
American Funds Washington Mutual R5
Price$66.77
Change+$0.42 (+0.63%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets207.25B
NRACX vs RWMFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
NRACX vs. RWMFX commentary
Sep 28, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NRACX is a Buy and RWMFX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RWMFX has more cash in the bank: 207B vs. NRACX (1.93B). RWMFX pays higher dividends than NRACX: RWMFX (1.43) vs NRACX (0.00). NRACX was incepted earlier than RWMFX: NRACX (16 years) vs RWMFX (23 years). NRACX (1.82) is less costly to investors than RWMFX (0.31). RWMFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 29.00 vs. NRACX (8.00). RWMFX has a lower initial minimum investment than NRACX: RWMFX (250) vs NRACX (1000). NRACX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 8.07 vs. RWMFX (5.69). RWMFX return over 5 years is better than : 57.64 vs. NRACX (35.38).
| NRACX | RWMFX | NRACX / RWMFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.82 | 0.31 | 587% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.82 | 0.31 | 587% |
| Fund Existence | 16 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 8.993 | 9.760 | 92% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.93B | 207B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 1.43 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 8.07 | 5.69 | 142% |
| Returns for 3 years | 44.92 | 46.35 | 97% |
| Returns for 5 years | 35.38 | 57.64 | 61% |
| Returns for 10 years | 45.91 | 93.97 | 49% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement