Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
NRACX vs RWEBX
NRACX vs RWEBX Comparison
Open Charts NRACX vs RWEBX
Neuberger Berman Quality Equity C
Price$50.51
Change+$0.17 (+0.34%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.93B
American Funds Washington Mutual R2E
Price$66.32
Change+$0.27 (+0.41%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets206.71B
NRACX vs RWEBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
NRACX vs. RWEBX commentary
Oct 21, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NRACX is a Buy and RWEBX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RWEBX has more cash in the bank: 207B vs. NRACX (1.93B). RWEBX pays higher dividends than NRACX: RWEBX (0.76) vs NRACX (0.00). NRACX was incepted earlier than RWEBX: NRACX (16 years) vs RWEBX (11 years). NRACX (1.82) is less costly to investors than RWEBX (1.06). RWEBX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 29.00 vs. NRACX (8.00). RWEBX has a lower initial minimum investment than NRACX: RWEBX (250) vs NRACX (1000). NRACX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 6.76 vs. RWEBX (3.29). RWEBX return over 5 years is better than : 45.88 vs. NRACX (26.18).
| NRACX | RWEBX | NRACX / RWEBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.82 | 1.06 | 172% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.82 | 1.06 | 172% |
| Fund Existence | 16 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 8.414 | 9.079 | 93% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.93B | 207B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.76 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 6.76 | 3.29 | 206% |
| Returns for 3 years | 39.68 | 38.78 | 102% |
| Returns for 5 years | 26.18 | 45.88 | 57% |
| Returns for 10 years | 35.35 | 73.45 | 48% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement