Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
NQGCX vs TEDSX
NQGCX vs TEDSX Comparison
Open Charts NQGCX vs TEDSX
Nuveen Global Equity Income C
Price$41.65
Change-$0.41 (-0.97%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets148.67M
Franklin Mutual Global Discovery C
Price$32.44
Change-$0.36 (-1.10%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets9.43B
NQGCX vs TEDSX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
NQGCX vs. TEDSX commentary
Nov 14, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NQGCX is a Buy and TEDSX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
TEDSX has more cash in the bank: 9.43B vs. NQGCX (149M). NQGCX pays higher dividends than TEDSX: NQGCX (1.23) vs TEDSX (0.75). NQGCX was incepted earlier than TEDSX: NQGCX (16 years) vs TEDSX (33 years). NQGCX (2.02) and TEDSX (1.96) have similar cost to investors . TEDSX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 34.55 vs. NQGCX (30.00). TEDSX has a lower initial minimum investment than NQGCX: TEDSX (1000) vs NQGCX (2500). NQGCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 22.24 vs. TEDSX (5.08). NQGCX return over 5 years is better than : 81.54 vs. TEDSX (27.14).
| NQGCX | TEDSX | NQGCX / TEDSX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.86 | 1.96 | 95% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.02 | 1.96 | 103% |
| Fund Existence | 16 years | 33 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 23.297 | 16.851 | 138% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 1000 | 250% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 149M | 9.43B | 2% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.23 | 0.75 | 163% |
| Returns for 1 year | 22.24 | 5.08 | 438% |
| Returns for 3 years | 56.11 | 17.27 | 325% |
| Returns for 5 years | 81.54 | 27.14 | 300% |
| Returns for 10 years | 92.28 | 10.70 | 862% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement