Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
NQGCX vs TEDRX
NQGCX vs TEDRX Comparison
Open Charts NQGCX vs TEDRX
Nuveen Global Equity Income C
Price$41.65
Change-$0.41 (-0.97%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets148.67M
Franklin Mutual Global Discovery R
Price$31.57
Change-$0.36 (-1.13%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets9.43B
NQGCX vs TEDRX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
NQGCX vs. TEDRX commentary
Nov 14, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NQGCX is a Buy and TEDRX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
TEDRX has more cash in the bank: 9.43B vs. NQGCX (149M). TEDRX pays higher dividends than NQGCX: TEDRX (1.35) vs NQGCX (1.23). NQGCX was incepted earlier than TEDRX: NQGCX (16 years) vs TEDRX (24 years). NQGCX (2.02) is less costly to investors than TEDRX (1.46). TEDRX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 34.55 vs. NQGCX (30.00). TEDRX has a lower initial minimum investment than NQGCX: TEDRX (1000) vs NQGCX (2500). NQGCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 21.25 vs. TEDRX (5.32). NQGCX return over 5 years is better than : 79.77 vs. TEDRX (27.58).
| NQGCX | TEDRX | NQGCX / TEDRX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.86 | 1.46 | 127% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.02 | 1.46 | 138% |
| Fund Existence | 16 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 22.096 | 17.303 | 128% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 1000 | 250% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 149M | 9.43B | 2% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.23 | 1.35 | 91% |
| Returns for 1 year | 21.25 | 5.32 | 399% |
| Returns for 3 years | 55.67 | 17.54 | 317% |
| Returns for 5 years | 79.77 | 27.58 | 289% |
| Returns for 10 years | 88.27 | 10.49 | 841% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers