Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
NQGAX vs TEDSX
NQGAX vs TEDSX Comparison
Open Charts NQGAX vs TEDSX
Nuveen Global Equity Income A
Price$41.81
Change-$0.41 (-0.97%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets148.67M
Franklin Mutual Global Discovery C
Price$32.44
Change-$0.36 (-1.10%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets9.43B
NQGAX vs TEDSX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
NQGAX vs. TEDSX commentary
Nov 14, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NQGAX is a Buy and TEDSX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
TEDSX has more cash in the bank: 9.43B vs. NQGAX (149M). NQGAX pays higher dividends than TEDSX: NQGAX (1.86) vs TEDSX (0.75). NQGAX was incepted earlier than TEDSX: NQGAX (16 years) vs TEDSX (33 years). TEDSX (1.96) is less costly to investors than NQGAX (1.27). TEDSX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 34.55 vs. NQGAX (30.00). TEDSX has a lower initial minimum investment than NQGAX: TEDSX (1000) vs NQGAX (2500). NQGAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 23.15 vs. TEDSX (5.08). NQGAX return over 5 years is better than : 88.51 vs. TEDSX (27.14).
| NQGAX | TEDSX | NQGAX / TEDSX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.11 | 1.96 | 57% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.27 | 1.96 | 65% |
| Fund Existence | 16 years | 33 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 24.084 | 16.851 | 143% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 1000 | 250% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 149M | 9.43B | 2% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.86 | 0.75 | 246% |
| Returns for 1 year | 23.15 | 5.08 | 456% |
| Returns for 3 years | 59.67 | 17.27 | 346% |
| Returns for 5 years | 88.51 | 27.14 | 326% |
| Returns for 10 years | 102.50 | 10.70 | 958% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement