Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
NQCRX vs RMEBX
NQCRX vs RMEBX Comparison
Open Charts NQCRX vs RMEBX
Nuveen Large Cap Value Opportunities I
Price$5.67
Change+$0.03 (+0.53%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets25.19M
American Funds American Mutual R2E
Price$61.85
Change+$0.16 (+0.26%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets110.88B
NQCRX vs RMEBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
NQCRX vs. RMEBX commentary
Oct 19, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NQCRX is a Hold and RMEBX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMEBX has more cash in the bank: 111B vs. NQCRX (25.2M). NQCRX pays higher dividends than RMEBX: NQCRX (1.76) vs RMEBX (1.05). NQCRX was incepted earlier than RMEBX: NQCRX (19 years) vs RMEBX (11 years). NQCRX (1.36) is less costly to investors than RMEBX (1.07). RMEBX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 31.00 vs. NQCRX (25.00). RMEBX has a lower initial minimum investment than NQCRX: RMEBX (250) vs NQCRX (100000). NQCRX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 9.87 vs. RMEBX (4.81). RMEBX return over 5 years is better than : 55.95 vs. NQCRX (47.47).
| NQCRX | RMEBX | NQCRX / RMEBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.75 | 1.07 | 70% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.36 | 1.07 | 127% |
| Fund Existence | 19 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 15.714 | 13.527 | 116% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 100000 | 250 | 40,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 25.2M | 111B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.76 | 1.05 | 168% |
| Returns for 1 year | 9.87 | 4.81 | 205% |
| Returns for 3 years | 54.07 | 38.19 | 142% |
| Returns for 5 years | 47.47 | 55.95 | 85% |
| Returns for 10 years | -45.81 | 89.36 | -51% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement