Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
NQCCX vs RMEBX
NQCCX vs RMEBX Comparison
Open Charts NQCCX vs RMEBX
Nuveen Large Cap Value Opportunities C
Price$4.21
Change+$0.10 (+2.43%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets30.38M
American Funds American Mutual R2E
Price$60.49
Change-$1.74 (-2.80%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets111.52B
NQCCX vs RMEBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
NQCCX vs. RMEBX commentary
Feb 05, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NQCCX is a Hold and RMEBX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMEBX has more cash in the bank: 112B vs. NQCCX (30.4M). RMEBX pays higher dividends than NQCCX: RMEBX (1.08) vs NQCCX (0.28). NQCCX was incepted earlier than RMEBX: NQCCX (19 years) vs RMEBX (11 years). NQCCX (2.35) is less costly to investors than RMEBX (1.07). RMEBX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 30.00 vs. NQCCX (25.00). RMEBX has a lower initial minimum investment than NQCCX: RMEBX (250) vs NQCCX (2500). NQCCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 13.22 vs. RMEBX (7.30). RMEBX return over 5 years is better than : 43.15 vs. NQCCX (27.72).
| NQCCX | RMEBX | NQCCX / RMEBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.75 | 1.07 | 164% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.35 | 1.07 | 220% |
| Fund Existence | 19 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 5.779 | 2.231 | 259% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 250 | 1,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 30.4M | 112B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.28 | 1.08 | 26% |
| Returns for 1 year | 13.22 | 7.30 | 181% |
| Returns for 3 years | 38.05 | 28.21 | 135% |
| Returns for 5 years | 27.72 | 43.15 | 64% |
| Returns for 10 years | -25.02 | 103.95 | -24% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement