Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
NQCCX vs RMEBX
NQCCX vs RMEBX Comparison
Open Charts NQCCX vs RMEBX
Nuveen Large Cap Value Opportunities C
Price$4.14
Change+$0.03 (+0.73%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets25.13M
American Funds American Mutual R2E
Price$61.62
Change+$0.38 (+0.62%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets111.09B
NQCCX vs RMEBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
NQCCX vs. RMEBX commentary
Sep 30, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NQCCX is a Buy and RMEBX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMEBX has more cash in the bank: 111B vs. NQCCX (25.1M). RMEBX pays higher dividends than NQCCX: RMEBX (1.09) vs NQCCX (0.96). NQCCX was incepted earlier than RMEBX: NQCCX (19 years) vs RMEBX (11 years). NQCCX (2.36) is less costly to investors than RMEBX (1.07). NQCCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 35.00 vs. RMEBX (31.00). RMEBX has a lower initial minimum investment than NQCCX: RMEBX (250) vs NQCCX (2500). NQCCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 10.78 vs. RMEBX (6.26). RMEBX return over 5 years is better than : 62.00 vs. NQCCX (33.78).
| NQCCX | RMEBX | NQCCX / RMEBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.75 | 1.07 | 164% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.36 | 1.07 | 221% |
| Fund Existence | 19 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 15.966 | 13.105 | 122% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 250 | 1,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 25.1M | 111B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.96 | 1.09 | 88% |
| Returns for 1 year | 10.78 | 6.26 | 172% |
| Returns for 3 years | 54.67 | 41.49 | 132% |
| Returns for 5 years | 33.78 | 62.00 | 54% |
| Returns for 10 years | -56.59 | 101.70 | -56% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement