Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
NQCCX vs RMEBX
NQCCX vs RMEBX Comparison
Open Charts NQCCX vs RMEBX
Nuveen Large Cap Value Opportunities C
Price$4.10
Change+$0.02 (+0.49%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets25.19M
American Funds American Mutual R2E
Price$61.85
Change+$0.16 (+0.26%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets111.18B
NQCCX vs RMEBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
NQCCX vs. RMEBX commentary
Oct 20, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NQCCX is a Hold and RMEBX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMEBX has more cash in the bank: 111B vs. NQCCX (25.2M). RMEBX pays higher dividends than NQCCX: RMEBX (1.05) vs NQCCX (0.95). NQCCX was incepted earlier than RMEBX: NQCCX (19 years) vs RMEBX (11 years). NQCCX (2.36) is less costly to investors than RMEBX (1.07). RMEBX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 31.00 vs. NQCCX (25.00). RMEBX has a lower initial minimum investment than NQCCX: RMEBX (250) vs NQCCX (2500). NQCCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 6.88 vs. RMEBX (4.81). RMEBX return over 5 years is better than : 55.95 vs. NQCCX (25.25).
| NQCCX | RMEBX | NQCCX / RMEBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.75 | 1.07 | 164% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.36 | 1.07 | 221% |
| Fund Existence | 19 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 14.846 | 13.527 | 110% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 250 | 1,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 25.2M | 111B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.95 | 1.05 | 90% |
| Returns for 1 year | 6.88 | 4.81 | 143% |
| Returns for 3 years | 45.19 | 38.19 | 118% |
| Returns for 5 years | 25.25 | 55.95 | 45% |
| Returns for 10 years | -60.33 | 89.36 | -68% |