Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
NQCCX vs RMEBX
NQCCX vs RMEBX Comparison
Open Charts NQCCX vs RMEBX
Nuveen Large Cap Value Opportunities C
Price$4.03
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets27.94M
American Funds American Mutual R2E
Price$59.72
Change+$0.01 (+0.02%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets111.8B
NQCCX vs RMEBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
NQCCX vs. RMEBX commentary
Dec 28, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NQCCX is a Hold and RMEBX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMEBX has more cash in the bank: 112B vs. NQCCX (27.9M). RMEBX pays higher dividends than NQCCX: RMEBX (1.03) vs NQCCX (0.92). NQCCX was incepted earlier than RMEBX: NQCCX (19 years) vs RMEBX (11 years). NQCCX (2.35) is less costly to investors than RMEBX (1.07). RMEBX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 31.00 vs. NQCCX (25.00). RMEBX has a lower initial minimum investment than NQCCX: RMEBX (250) vs NQCCX (2500). NQCCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 11.37 vs. RMEBX (7.85). RMEBX return over 5 years is better than : 45.24 vs. NQCCX (28.27).
| NQCCX | RMEBX | NQCCX / RMEBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.75 | 1.07 | 164% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.35 | 1.07 | 220% |
| Fund Existence | 19 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 12.885 | 9.617 | 134% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 250 | 1,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 27.9M | 112B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.92 | 1.03 | 89% |
| Returns for 1 year | 11.37 | 7.85 | 145% |
| Returns for 3 years | 35.20 | 28.25 | 125% |
| Returns for 5 years | 28.27 | 45.24 | 62% |
| Returns for 10 years | -36.42 | 88.81 | -41% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement