Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
NQCAX vs RMEBX
NQCAX vs RMEBX Comparison
Open Charts NQCAX vs RMEBX
Nuveen Large Cap Value Opportunities A
Price$5.86
Change+$0.24 (+4.27%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets30.27M
American Funds American Mutual R2E
Price$60.49
Change-$1.74 (-2.80%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets111.52B
NQCAX vs RMEBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
NQCAX vs. RMEBX commentary
Feb 04, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NQCAX is a Hold and RMEBX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMEBX has more cash in the bank: 112B vs. NQCAX (30.3M). RMEBX pays higher dividends than NQCAX: RMEBX (1.08) vs NQCAX (0.92). NQCAX was incepted earlier than RMEBX: NQCAX (19 years) vs RMEBX (11 years). NQCAX (1.60) is less costly to investors than RMEBX (1.07). RMEBX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 30.00 vs. NQCAX (25.00). RMEBX has a lower initial minimum investment than NQCAX: RMEBX (250) vs NQCAX (2500). NQCAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 16.76 vs. RMEBX (7.30). NQCAX return over 5 years is better than : 46.92 vs. RMEBX (43.15).
| NQCAX | RMEBX | NQCAX / RMEBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.00 | 1.07 | 93% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.60 | 1.07 | 150% |
| Fund Existence | 19 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 5.967 | 2.231 | 267% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 250 | 1,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 30.3M | 112B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.92 | 1.08 | 85% |
| Returns for 1 year | 16.76 | 7.30 | 229% |
| Returns for 3 years | 46.84 | 28.21 | 166% |
| Returns for 5 years | 46.92 | 43.15 | 109% |
| Returns for 10 years | 0.17 | 103.95 | 0% |