Advertisement
NPTVF vs TVBCY
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NPTVF is a Hold and TVBCY is a Hold.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
NPTVF’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileTVBCY’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).
- NPTVF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
- TVBCY’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
Price Growth
NPTVF (@Broadcasting) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while TVBCY (@Broadcasting) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Broadcasting industry was -2.45%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +1.55%, and the average quarterly price growth was +21.21%.
Industries' Descriptions
@Broadcasting (-2.45% weekly)Broadcasting industry includes companies that operate facilities broadcasting radio and/or television programs. Sirius XM Holdings, Inc. (which provides satellite radio and online radio services); Fox Corporation (news and sports broadcasting on TV); and CBS Corporation (TV broadcasting) are some of the behemoths of this industry. The burgeoning digital space has been a disruption for the industry, propelling them to up the ante on their own digital presence.
| NPTVF | TVBCY | NPTVF / TVBCY | |
| Capitalization | 5.61B | 190M | 2,951% |
| EBITDA | 73B | N/A | - |
| Gain YTD | 55.021 | -1.962 | -2,804% |
| P/E Ratio | 17.08 | N/A | - |
| Revenue | 444B | N/A | - |
| Total Cash | 174B | N/A | - |
| Total Debt | 11.1B | N/A | - |
NPTVF | TVBCY | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 43 | 39 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 25 Undervalued | 62 Fair valued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 49 | 100 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 10 | 93 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 38 | 76 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 45 | 77 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 49 | 29 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
NPTVF's Valuation (25) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for TVBCY (62). This means that NPTVF’s stock grew somewhat faster than TVBCY’s over the last 12 months.
NPTVF's Profit vs Risk Rating (49) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for TVBCY (100). This means that NPTVF’s stock grew somewhat faster than TVBCY’s over the last 12 months.
NPTVF's SMR Rating (10) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for TVBCY (93). This means that NPTVF’s stock grew significantly faster than TVBCY’s over the last 12 months.
NPTVF's Price Growth Rating (38) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for TVBCY (76). This means that NPTVF’s stock grew somewhat faster than TVBCY’s over the last 12 months.
NPTVF's P/E Growth Rating (45) in the null industry is in the same range as TVBCY (77). This means that NPTVF’s stock grew similarly to TVBCY’s over the last 12 months.
| RSI ODDS (%) |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) |
| Momentum ODDS (%) |
| MACD ODDS (%) |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) |
| Advances ODDS (%) |
| Declines ODDS (%) |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) |
| Aroon ODDS (%) |
Advertisement
NPTVF and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, NPTVF has been loosely correlated with MDIA. These tickers have moved in lockstep 51% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if NPTVF jumps, then MDIA could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To NPTVF | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| NPTVF | 100% | N/A | ||
| MDIA - NPTVF | 51% Loosely correlated | +2.88% | ||
| FHLD - NPTVF | 0% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| MTPVY - NPTVF | 0% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| IHRTB - NPTVF | -0% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| TVBCY - NPTVF | -6% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
More | ||||
TVBCY and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that TVBCY and EMMS have been poorly correlated (+24% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that TVBCY and EMMS's prices will move in lockstep.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To TVBCY | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| TVBCY | 100% | N/A | ||
| EMMS - TVBCY | 24% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| CURI - TVBCY | 20% Poorly correlated | +1.83% | ||
| MNIZ - TVBCY | 14% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| MTPVY - TVBCY | 8% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| FHLD - TVBCY | 1% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
More | ||||