NPTLF
Price
$10.00
Change
+$1.50 (+17.65%)
Updated
Jun 11 closing price
Capitalization
3.34B
NSGCF
Price
$0.02
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Jun 27 closing price
Capitalization
3.1M
Interact to see
Advertisement

NPTLF vs NSGCF

Header iconNPTLF vs NSGCF Comparison
Open Charts NPTLF vs NSGCFBanner chart's image
NORTHAM PLATINUM
Price$10.00
Change+$1.50 (+17.65%)
Volume$1K
Capitalization3.34B
NORTHSTAR GOLD
Price$0.02
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$11K
Capitalization3.1M
NPTLF vs NSGCF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
NPTLF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
NSGCF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
NPTLF vs. NSGCF commentary
Jun 30, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NPTLF is a Hold and NSGCF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jun 30, 2025
Stock price -- (NPTLF: $10.00 vs. NSGCF: $0.02)
Brand notoriety: NPTLF and NSGCF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Precious Metals industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: NPTLF: 86% vs. NSGCF: 15%
Market capitalization -- NPTLF: $3.34B vs. NSGCF: $3.1M
NPTLF [@Precious Metals] is valued at $3.34B. NSGCF’s [@Precious Metals] market capitalization is $3.1M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Precious Metals] industry ranges from $47.49B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Precious Metals] industry is $1.1B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

NPTLF’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileNSGCF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • NPTLF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • NSGCF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, NPTLF is a better buy in the long-term than NSGCF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

NPTLF’s TA Score shows that 1 TA indicator(s) are bullish while NSGCF’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • NPTLF’s TA Score: 1 bullish, 1 bearish.
  • NSGCF’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, both NPTLF and NSGCF are a good buy in the short-term.

Price Growth

NPTLF (@Precious Metals) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while NSGCF (@Precious Metals) price change was -0.59% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Precious Metals industry was +0.06%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +9.36%, and the average quarterly price growth was +54.26%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Precious Metals (+0.06% weekly)

The Precious Metals industry is engaged in exploring/mining metals that are considered to be rare and/or have a high economic value. Popular precious metals include gold, platinum and silver - all three of which are largely used in jewelry, art and coinage alongwith having some industrial uses as well. Precious metals used in industrial processes include iridium, (used in specialty alloys), and palladium ( used in electronics and chemical applications). Historically, precious metals have traded at much higher prices than common industrial metals. Newmont Goldcorp Corp, Barrick Gold Corp and Freeport-McMoRan are few of the major precious metals producing companies in the U.S.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NPTLF($3.34B) has a higher market cap than NSGCF($3.1M). NPTLF YTD gains are higher at: 59.236 vs. NSGCF (2.422). NPTLF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 20B vs. NSGCF (-1.48M). NPTLF has more cash in the bank: 121M vs. NSGCF (675K). NSGCF has less debt than NPTLF: NSGCF (60K) vs NPTLF (24.4B). NPTLF has higher revenues than NSGCF: NPTLF (40.3B) vs NSGCF (0).
NPTLFNSGCFNPTLF / NSGCF
Capitalization3.34B3.1M107,715%
EBITDA20B-1.48M-1,352,421%
Gain YTD59.2362.4222,446%
P/E Ratio0.07N/A-
Revenue40.3B0-
Total Cash121M675K17,926%
Total Debt24.4B60K40,666,667%
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
NPTLFNSGCF
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
85%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
88%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
33%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
90%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
33%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
88%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
9%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
83%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
5%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
83%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
85%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
76%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
NPTLF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
NSGCF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
PYPL73.640.47
+0.64%
PayPal Holdings
RM29.330.15
+0.51%
REGIONAL MANAGEMENT Corp
UGI36.130.08
+0.22%
UGI Corp
UMH16.73-0.21
-1.24%
UMH Properties
ZOOZ0.90-0.08
-8.02%
ZOOZ Power Ltd

NPTLF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, NPTLF has been loosely correlated with CALRF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 38% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if NPTLF jumps, then CALRF could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To NPTLF
1D Price
Change %
NPTLF100%
N/A
CALRF - NPTLF
38%
Loosely correlated
N/A
SVGAF - NPTLF
36%
Loosely correlated
-50.00%
ZMPLF - NPTLF
31%
Poorly correlated
N/A
NSGCF - NPTLF
23%
Poorly correlated
-9.37%
AKEMF - NPTLF
10%
Poorly correlated
+1.76%
More

NSGCF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that NSGCF and CALRF have been poorly correlated (+30% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that NSGCF and CALRF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To NSGCF
1D Price
Change %
NSGCF100%
-9.37%
CALRF - NSGCF
30%
Poorly correlated
N/A
NPTLF - NSGCF
23%
Poorly correlated
N/A
ALVLF - NSGCF
22%
Poorly correlated
+6.47%
GGLDF - NSGCF
21%
Poorly correlated
-5.03%
NSUPF - NSGCF
5%
Poorly correlated
+0.15%
More