NPPXF
Price
$1.00
Change
-$0.02 (-1.96%)
Updated
Feb 6 closing price
Capitalization
79.36B
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
PCWLF
Price
$0.77
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Feb 6 closing price
Capitalization
5.99B
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

NPPXF vs PCWLF

Header iconNPPXF vs PCWLF Comparison
Open Charts NPPXF vs PCWLFBanner chart's image
NTT
Price$1.00
Change-$0.02 (-1.96%)
Volume$17K
Capitalization79.36B
PCCW
Price$0.77
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$4.11K
Capitalization5.99B
NPPXF vs PCWLF Comparison Chart in %
NPPXF
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
PCWLF
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
NPPXF vs. PCWLF commentary
Feb 08, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NPPXF is a Hold and PCWLF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Feb 08, 2026
Stock price -- (NPPXF: $1.00 vs. PCWLF: $0.77)
Brand notoriety: NPPXF and PCWLF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Major Telecommunications industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: NPPXF: 10% vs. PCWLF: 103%
Market capitalization -- NPPXF: $79.36B vs. PCWLF: $5.99B
NPPXF [@Major Telecommunications] is valued at $79.36B. PCWLF’s [@Major Telecommunications] market capitalization is $5.99B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Major Telecommunications] industry ranges from $220.78B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Major Telecommunications] industry is $19.83B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

NPPXF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whilePCWLF’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • NPPXF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • PCWLF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, PCWLF is a better buy in the long-term than NPPXF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

NPPXF’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while PCWLF’s TA Score has 6 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • NPPXF’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • PCWLF’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, PCWLF is a better buy in the short-term than NPPXF.

Price Growth

NPPXF (@Major Telecommunications) experienced а +4.17% price change this week, while PCWLF (@Major Telecommunications) price change was +2.90% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Major Telecommunications industry was +0.94%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +3.50%, and the average quarterly price growth was +12.87%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Major Telecommunications (+0.94% weekly)

Major telecommunications include companies that make communication possible across the globe – by providing voice and data transmission via multiple channels such as phone or the Internet, through airwaves or cables, through wires or wirelessly. The ease with which we connect with anyone, anywhere in the world is thanks in large part to the infrastructure created by the telecom industry. Some major telecom players include AT&T Inc., Verizon Communications Inc. and Nippon Telegraph and Telephone Corporation.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NPPXF($79.4B) has a higher market cap than PCWLF($5.99B). PCWLF YTD gains are higher at: 10.312 vs. NPPXF (-2.913). NPPXF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 3.51T vs. PCWLF (5.8B). NPPXF has more cash in the bank: 4.49T vs. PCWLF (3.14B). PCWLF has less debt than NPPXF: PCWLF (59.3B) vs NPPXF (15.59T). NPPXF has higher revenues than PCWLF: NPPXF (13.89T) vs PCWLF (38.8B).
NPPXFPCWLFNPPXF / PCWLF
Capitalization79.4B5.99B1,326%
EBITDA3.51T5.8B60,628%
Gain YTD-2.91310.312-28%
P/E Ratio12.49N/A-
Revenue13.89T38.8B35,791%
Total Cash4.49T3.14B142,984%
Total Debt15.59T59.3B26,290%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
NPPXF vs PCWLF: Fundamental Ratings
NPPXF
PCWLF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
50
Fair valued
50
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
10053
SMR RATING
1..100
100100
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5646
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
100100
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5050

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

NPPXF's Valuation (50) in the null industry is in the same range as PCWLF (50). This means that NPPXF’s stock grew similarly to PCWLF’s over the last 12 months.

PCWLF's Profit vs Risk Rating (53) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for NPPXF (100). This means that PCWLF’s stock grew somewhat faster than NPPXF’s over the last 12 months.

PCWLF's SMR Rating (100) in the null industry is in the same range as NPPXF (100). This means that PCWLF’s stock grew similarly to NPPXF’s over the last 12 months.

PCWLF's Price Growth Rating (46) in the null industry is in the same range as NPPXF (56). This means that PCWLF’s stock grew similarly to NPPXF’s over the last 12 months.

PCWLF's P/E Growth Rating (100) in the null industry is in the same range as NPPXF (100). This means that PCWLF’s stock grew similarly to NPPXF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
NPPXFPCWLF
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
75%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
67%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
72%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
73%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
79%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
75%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
67%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
62%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
68%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
68%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
60%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
54%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 18 days ago
56%
Bearish Trend 24 days ago
52%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
79%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
61%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
56%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
66%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
NPPXF
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
PCWLF
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
TGE1.280.05
+4.07%
Generation Essentials Group (The)
SAIA415.4610.71
+2.65%
Saia
IMAX37.280.87
+2.39%
Imax Corp
FITBP24.650.13
+0.51%
Fifth Third Bancorp
GCBC24.51-0.13
-0.53%
Greene County Bancorp

NPPXF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that NPPXF and PCWLF have been poorly correlated (+12% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that NPPXF and PCWLF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To NPPXF
1D Price
Change %
NPPXF100%
-1.96%
PCWLF - NPPXF
12%
Poorly correlated
+0.45%
KKPNY - NPPXF
9%
Poorly correlated
+0.47%
KTEL - NPPXF
7%
Poorly correlated
N/A
KNIT - NPPXF
6%
Poorly correlated
N/A
NZTCF - NPPXF
4%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

PCWLF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that PCWLF and MTNOY have been poorly correlated (+15% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that PCWLF and MTNOY's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To PCWLF
1D Price
Change %
PCWLF100%
+0.45%
MTNOY - PCWLF
15%
Poorly correlated
+2.84%
MYTAY - PCWLF
13%
Poorly correlated
N/A
NPPXF - PCWLF
12%
Poorly correlated
-1.96%
PTITF - PCWLF
9%
Poorly correlated
N/A
PTXKY - PCWLF
5%
Poorly correlated
-10.15%
More