NPPTF
Price
$0.70
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Sep 5 closing price
Capitalization
89.69M
OSCUF
Price
$11.18
Change
+$0.68 (+6.48%)
Updated
Sep 5 closing price
Capitalization
10.62B
Interact to see
Advertisement

NPPTF vs OSCUF

Header iconNPPTF vs OSCUF Comparison
Open Charts NPPTF vs OSCUFBanner chart's image
Neptune Digital Assets
Price$0.70
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$166.77K
Capitalization89.69M
Japan Exchange Group
Price$11.18
Change+$0.68 (+6.48%)
Volume$460
Capitalization10.62B
NPPTF vs OSCUF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
NPPTF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
OSCUF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
NPPTF vs. OSCUF commentary
Sep 08, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NPPTF is a Hold and OSCUF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 08, 2025
Stock price -- (NPPTF: $0.70 vs. OSCUF: $11.18)
Brand notoriety: NPPTF and OSCUF are both not notable
NPPTF represents the Investment Banks/Brokers, while OSCUF is part of the Financial Publishing/Services industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: NPPTF: 69% vs. OSCUF: 19%
Market capitalization -- NPPTF: $89.69M vs. OSCUF: $10.62B
NPPTF [@Investment Banks/Brokers] is valued at $89.69M. OSCUF’s [@Financial Publishing/Services] market capitalization is $10.62B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Investment Banks/Brokers] industry ranges from $928.5B to $0. The market cap for tickers in the [@Financial Publishing/Services] industry ranges from $164.27B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Investment Banks/Brokers] industry is $10.09B. The average market capitalization across the [@Financial Publishing/Services] industry is $30.66B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

NPPTF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileOSCUF’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • NPPTF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • OSCUF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, NPPTF is a better buy in the long-term than OSCUF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

NPPTF’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while OSCUF’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • NPPTF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • OSCUF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 6 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, NPPTF is a better buy in the short-term than OSCUF.

Price Growth

NPPTF (@Investment Banks/Brokers) experienced а -8.95% price change this week, while OSCUF (@Financial Publishing/Services) price change was +4.98% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Investment Banks/Brokers industry was +11.79%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +5.85%, and the average quarterly price growth was +55.65%.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Financial Publishing/Services industry was -0.69%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -1.07%, and the average quarterly price growth was +13.33%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Investment Banks/Brokers (+11.79% weekly)

These banks specialize in underwriting (helping companies with debt financing or equity issuances), IPOs, facilitating mergers and other corporate reorganizations and acting as a broker or financial advisor for institutions. They might also trade securities on their own accounts. Investment banks potentially thrive on expanding its network of clients, since that could help them increase profits. Goldman Sachs, Morgan Stanley and CME Group Inc are some of the largest investment banking companies.

@Financial Publishing/Services (-0.69% weekly)

The financial publishing /services sector includes companies that provide informational products and services that are of value to investors, financial/analytics professionals and other interested readers. The products include real-time stock quotes, financial news and analyses. Think S&P Global, Inc., Moody`s Corporation, Thomson-Reuters Corp and IHS Markit Ltd. Information is critical in making financial or investment decisions, and what makes this industry’s output relevant at all times, across various economic conditions.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
OSCUF($10.6B) has a higher market cap than NPPTF($89.7M). NPPTF has higher P/E ratio than OSCUF: NPPTF (49.35) vs OSCUF (28.18). NPPTF YTD gains are higher at: -0.965 vs. OSCUF (-9.839). OSCUF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 109B vs. NPPTF (-2.12M). OSCUF has more cash in the bank: 243B vs. NPPTF (10.3M). NPPTF has less debt than OSCUF: NPPTF (7.47M) vs OSCUF (52.5B). OSCUF has higher revenues than NPPTF: OSCUF (162B) vs NPPTF (1.84M).
NPPTFOSCUFNPPTF / OSCUF
Capitalization89.7M10.6B1%
EBITDA-2.12M109B-0%
Gain YTD-0.965-9.83910%
P/E Ratio49.3528.18175%
Revenue1.84M162B0%
Total Cash10.3M243B0%
Total Debt7.47M52.5B0%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
NPPTF vs OSCUF: Fundamental Ratings
NPPTF
OSCUF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
91
Overvalued
86
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
68100
SMR RATING
1..100
9254
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4555
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
9660
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5039

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

OSCUF's Valuation (86) in the null industry is in the same range as NPPTF (91). This means that OSCUF’s stock grew similarly to NPPTF’s over the last 12 months.

NPPTF's Profit vs Risk Rating (68) in the null industry is in the same range as OSCUF (100). This means that NPPTF’s stock grew similarly to OSCUF’s over the last 12 months.

OSCUF's SMR Rating (54) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for NPPTF (92). This means that OSCUF’s stock grew somewhat faster than NPPTF’s over the last 12 months.

NPPTF's Price Growth Rating (45) in the null industry is in the same range as OSCUF (55). This means that NPPTF’s stock grew similarly to OSCUF’s over the last 12 months.

OSCUF's P/E Growth Rating (60) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for NPPTF (96). This means that OSCUF’s stock grew somewhat faster than NPPTF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
NPPTFOSCUF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
50%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
61%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
65%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
88%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
50%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
60%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
45%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 13 days ago
86%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
33%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 7 days ago
51%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
45%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
56%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
NPPTF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
OSCUF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
BTSGY16.50N/A
N/A
BTS Group Holdings Public Company Ltd
SATLF9.88N/A
N/A
Zozo Inc.
IPNAF28.75N/A
N/A
Information Planning Co., Ltd.
SABOF0.26N/A
N/A
Sabio Holdings Inc.
PROSF60.49-0.55
-0.90%
Prosus NV

NPPTF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, NPPTF has been loosely correlated with DMGGF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 44% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if NPPTF jumps, then DMGGF could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To NPPTF
1D Price
Change %
NPPTF100%
+0.15%
DMGGF - NPPTF
44%
Loosely correlated
+6.80%
BBKCF - NPPTF
32%
Poorly correlated
-1.98%
OPY - NPPTF
30%
Poorly correlated
-2.28%
ARBKF - NPPTF
22%
Poorly correlated
-3.33%
DEFT - NPPTF
21%
Poorly correlated
+2.53%
More

OSCUF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that OSCUF and MCQEF have been poorly correlated (+12% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that OSCUF and MCQEF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To OSCUF
1D Price
Change %
OSCUF100%
+6.48%
MCQEF - OSCUF
12%
Poorly correlated
N/A
NHMAF - OSCUF
11%
Poorly correlated
N/A
SPXCY - OSCUF
10%
Poorly correlated
-0.30%
NPPTF - OSCUF
9%
Poorly correlated
+0.15%
NZSTF - OSCUF
9%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More