NPPTF
Price
$0.70
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Sep 5 closing price
Capitalization
89.69M
OPY
Price
$72.74
Change
-$1.70 (-2.28%)
Updated
Sep 5 closing price
Capitalization
765.26M
47 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

NPPTF vs OPY

Header iconNPPTF vs OPY Comparison
Open Charts NPPTF vs OPYBanner chart's image
Neptune Digital Assets
Price$0.70
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$166.77K
Capitalization89.69M
Oppenheimer Holdings
Price$72.74
Change-$1.70 (-2.28%)
Volume$42.97K
Capitalization765.26M
NPPTF vs OPY Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
NPPTF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
OPY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
NPPTF vs. OPY commentary
Sep 08, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NPPTF is a Hold and OPY is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 08, 2025
Stock price -- (NPPTF: $0.70 vs. OPY: $72.74)
Brand notoriety: NPPTF and OPY are both not notable
Both companies represent the Investment Banks/Brokers industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: NPPTF: 69% vs. OPY: 96%
Market capitalization -- NPPTF: $89.69M vs. OPY: $765.26M
NPPTF [@Investment Banks/Brokers] is valued at $89.69M. OPY’s [@Investment Banks/Brokers] market capitalization is $765.26M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Investment Banks/Brokers] industry ranges from $928.5B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Investment Banks/Brokers] industry is $10.09B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

NPPTF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileOPY’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • NPPTF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • OPY’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, OPY is a better buy in the long-term than NPPTF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

NPPTF’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while OPY’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • NPPTF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • OPY’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, NPPTF is a better buy in the short-term than OPY.

Price Growth

NPPTF (@Investment Banks/Brokers) experienced а -8.95% price change this week, while OPY (@Investment Banks/Brokers) price change was +0.23% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Investment Banks/Brokers industry was +0.73%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +0.48%, and the average quarterly price growth was +41.22%.

Reported Earning Dates

OPY is expected to report earnings on Oct 24, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Investment Banks/Brokers (+0.73% weekly)

These banks specialize in underwriting (helping companies with debt financing or equity issuances), IPOs, facilitating mergers and other corporate reorganizations and acting as a broker or financial advisor for institutions. They might also trade securities on their own accounts. Investment banks potentially thrive on expanding its network of clients, since that could help them increase profits. Goldman Sachs, Morgan Stanley and CME Group Inc are some of the largest investment banking companies.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
OPY($765M) has a higher market cap than NPPTF($89.7M). NPPTF has higher P/E ratio than OPY: NPPTF (49.35) vs OPY (9.43). OPY YTD gains are higher at: 14.440 vs. NPPTF (-0.965). OPY has more cash in the bank: 28.8M vs. NPPTF (10.3M). NPPTF has less debt than OPY: NPPTF (7.47M) vs OPY (926M).
NPPTFOPYNPPTF / OPY
Capitalization89.7M765M12%
EBITDA-2.12MN/A-
Gain YTD-0.96514.440-7%
P/E Ratio49.359.43523%
Revenue1.84MN/A-
Total Cash10.3M28.8M36%
Total Debt7.47M926M1%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
NPPTF vs OPY: Fundamental Ratings
NPPTF
OPY
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5070
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
91
Overvalued
30
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
6818
SMR RATING
1..100
9270
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4547
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
9651
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5050

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

OPY's Valuation (30) in the Investment Banks Or Brokers industry is somewhat better than the same rating for NPPTF (91) in the null industry. This means that OPY’s stock grew somewhat faster than NPPTF’s over the last 12 months.

OPY's Profit vs Risk Rating (18) in the Investment Banks Or Brokers industry is somewhat better than the same rating for NPPTF (68) in the null industry. This means that OPY’s stock grew somewhat faster than NPPTF’s over the last 12 months.

OPY's SMR Rating (70) in the Investment Banks Or Brokers industry is in the same range as NPPTF (92) in the null industry. This means that OPY’s stock grew similarly to NPPTF’s over the last 12 months.

NPPTF's Price Growth Rating (45) in the null industry is in the same range as OPY (47) in the Investment Banks Or Brokers industry. This means that NPPTF’s stock grew similarly to OPY’s over the last 12 months.

OPY's P/E Growth Rating (51) in the Investment Banks Or Brokers industry is somewhat better than the same rating for NPPTF (96) in the null industry. This means that OPY’s stock grew somewhat faster than NPPTF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
NPPTFOPY
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
53%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
66%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
57%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
88%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
71%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
71%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
60%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 12 days ago
86%
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
72%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 13 days ago
58%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
45%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
46%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
NPPTF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
OPY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
BYDDF13.460.10
+0.75%
BYD Co., Ltd.
BTSGY16.50N/A
N/A
BTS Group Holdings Public Company Ltd
MNBO32.00N/A
N/A
MNB Holdings Corp.
JFEEF12.49N/A
N/A
JFE Holdings Inc.
IPNAF28.75N/A
N/A
Information Planning Co., Ltd.

NPPTF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, NPPTF has been loosely correlated with DMGGF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 44% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if NPPTF jumps, then DMGGF could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To NPPTF
1D Price
Change %
NPPTF100%
+0.15%
DMGGF - NPPTF
44%
Loosely correlated
+6.80%
BBKCF - NPPTF
32%
Poorly correlated
-1.98%
OPY - NPPTF
30%
Poorly correlated
-2.28%
ARBKF - NPPTF
22%
Poorly correlated
-3.33%
DEFT - NPPTF
21%
Poorly correlated
+2.53%
More

OPY and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, OPY has been loosely correlated with SF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 63% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if OPY jumps, then SF could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To OPY
1D Price
Change %
OPY100%
-2.28%
SF - OPY
63%
Loosely correlated
-2.71%
EVR - OPY
61%
Loosely correlated
+0.20%
MS - OPY
61%
Loosely correlated
-1.62%
LAZ - OPY
60%
Loosely correlated
-0.70%
JEF - OPY
59%
Loosely correlated
-2.26%
More