Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
NPFFX vs SCGVX
NPFFX vs SCGVX Comparison
Open Charts NPFFX vs SCGVX
American Funds New Perspective F1
Price$71.29
Change+$0.33 (+0.47%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets158.47B
Sands Capital Global Growth I
Price$33.26
Change+$0.17 (+0.51%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.17B
NPFFX vs SCGVX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
NPFFX vs. SCGVX commentary
Sep 07, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NPFFX is a Buy and SCGVX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NPFFX has more cash in the bank: 158B vs. SCGVX (1.17B). NPFFX pays higher dividends than SCGVX: NPFFX (0.45) vs SCGVX (0.00). NPFFX was incepted earlier than SCGVX: NPFFX (25 years) vs SCGVX (15 years). SCGVX (1.21) is less costly to investors than NPFFX (0.78). NPFFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 24.00 vs. SCGVX (17.00). NPFFX has a lower initial minimum investment than SCGVX: NPFFX (250) vs SCGVX (100000). SCGVX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 16.21 vs. NPFFX (15.09). NPFFX return over 5 years is better than : 35.07 vs. SCGVX (-0.81).
| NPFFX | SCGVX | NPFFX / SCGVX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.78 | 1.21 | 64% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.78 | 1.21 | 64% |
| Fund Existence | 25 years | 15 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 15.731 | 13.632 | 115% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 100000 | 0% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 158B | 1.17B | 13,470% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.45 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 15.09 | 16.21 | 93% |
| Returns for 3 years | 48.60 | 53.27 | 91% |
| Returns for 5 years | 35.07 | -0.81 | -4,356% |
| Returns for 10 years | 98.02 | 99.01 | 99% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement