Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
NPFCX vs ZGFIX
NPFCX vs ZGFIX Comparison
Open Charts NPFCX vs ZGFIX
American Funds New Perspective C
Price$67.06
Change+$0.11 (+0.16%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets162.72B
American Beacon Ninety One Gbl Frnchs R5
Price$19.56
Change+$0.05 (+0.26%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets475.41M
NPFCX vs ZGFIX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
NPFCX vs. ZGFIX commentary
Jan 17, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NPFCX is a Hold and ZGFIX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NPFCX has more cash in the bank: 163B vs. ZGFIX (475M). ZGFIX pays higher dividends than NPFCX: ZGFIX (0.70) vs NPFCX (0.35). NPFCX was incepted earlier than ZGFIX: NPFCX (25 years) vs ZGFIX (8 years). NPFCX (1.48) is less costly to investors than ZGFIX (0.87). NPFCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 24.00 vs. ZGFIX (14.00). NPFCX has a lower initial minimum investment than ZGFIX: NPFCX (250) vs ZGFIX (250000). NPFCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 15.18 vs. ZGFIX (11.92). ZGFIX return over 5 years is better than : 42.41 vs. NPFCX (15.11).
| NPFCX | ZGFIX | NPFCX / ZGFIX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.48 | 0.85 | 174% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.48 | 0.87 | 170% |
| Fund Existence | 25 years | 8 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 2.366 | 1.295 | 183% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 250000 | 0% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 163B | 475M | 34,316% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.35 | 0.70 | 49% |
| Returns for 1 year | 15.18 | 11.92 | 127% |
| Returns for 3 years | 42.77 | 35.22 | 121% |
| Returns for 5 years | 15.11 | 42.41 | 36% |
| Returns for 10 years | 114.38 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers