Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
NPFCX vs PRGSX
NPFCX vs PRGSX Comparison
Open Charts NPFCX vs PRGSX
American Funds New Perspective C
Price$66.95
Change-$0.41 (-0.61%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets162.72B
T. Rowe Price Global Stock
Price$72.06
Change-$0.37 (-0.51%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets7.4B
NPFCX vs PRGSX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
NPFCX vs. PRGSX commentary
Jan 15, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NPFCX is a Hold and PRGSX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NPFCX has more cash in the bank: 163B vs. PRGSX (7.4B). NPFCX pays higher dividends than PRGSX: NPFCX (0.35) vs PRGSX (0.15). NPFCX was incepted earlier than PRGSX: NPFCX (25 years) vs PRGSX (30 years). NPFCX (1.48) is less costly to investors than PRGSX (0.80). PRGSX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 139.20 vs. NPFCX (24.00). NPFCX has a lower initial minimum investment than PRGSX: NPFCX (250) vs PRGSX (2500). NPFCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 16.81 vs. PRGSX (14.48). NPFCX return over 5 years is better than : 14.93 vs. PRGSX (8.65).
| NPFCX | PRGSX | NPFCX / PRGSX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.48 | 0.80 | 185% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.48 | 0.80 | 185% |
| Fund Existence | 25 years | 30 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 2.198 | 3.669 | 60% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 2500 | 10% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 163B | 7.4B | 2,204% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.35 | 0.15 | 237% |
| Returns for 1 year | 16.81 | 14.48 | 116% |
| Returns for 3 years | 42.54 | 48.72 | 87% |
| Returns for 5 years | 14.93 | 8.65 | 173% |
| Returns for 10 years | 114.03 | 203.18 | 56% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers