NOV
Price
$13.08
Change
-$0.12 (-0.91%)
Updated
Jul 3 closing price
Capitalization
7.76B
21 days until earnings call
TGSGY
Price
$9.10
Change
+$0.22 (+2.48%)
Updated
Jul 3 closing price
Capitalization
1.72B
Interact to see
Advertisement

NOV vs TGSGY

Header iconNOV vs TGSGY Comparison
Open Charts NOV vs TGSGYBanner chart's image
NOV
Price$13.08
Change-$0.12 (-0.91%)
Volume$2.51M
Capitalization7.76B
TGS ASA
Price$9.10
Change+$0.22 (+2.48%)
Volume$5.73K
Capitalization1.72B
NOV vs TGSGY Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
NOV
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
TGSGY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
NOV vs. TGSGY commentary
Jul 07, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NOV is a Buy and TGSGY is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 07, 2025
Stock price -- (NOV: $13.08 vs. TGSGY: $9.10)
Brand notoriety: NOV and TGSGY are both not notable
Both companies represent the Oilfield Services/Equipment industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: NOV: 63% vs. TGSGY: 13%
Market capitalization -- NOV: $7.76B vs. TGSGY: $1.72B
NOV [@Oilfield Services/Equipment] is valued at $7.76B. TGSGY’s [@Oilfield Services/Equipment] market capitalization is $1.72B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Oilfield Services/Equipment] industry ranges from $79.1B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Oilfield Services/Equipment] industry is $3.83B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

NOV’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileTGSGY’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • NOV’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • TGSGY’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, NOV is a better buy in the long-term than TGSGY.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

NOV’s TA Score shows that 6 TA indicator(s) are bullish while TGSGY’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • NOV’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • TGSGY’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, NOV is a better buy in the short-term than TGSGY.

Price Growth

NOV (@Oilfield Services/Equipment) experienced а +0.62% price change this week, while TGSGY (@Oilfield Services/Equipment) price change was +3.17% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Oilfield Services/Equipment industry was +1.50%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +9.97%, and the average quarterly price growth was +5.78%.

Reported Earning Dates

NOV is expected to report earnings on Jul 28, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Oilfield Services/Equipment (+1.50% weekly)

The oilfield services/equipment industry is involved in providing various equipment and services to oil and natural gas producers. These companies rent drilling rigs and/or provide services to build and maintain oil and gas wells. The performance of this industry is dependent on demand for oil and natural gas, which in turn is often driven by macroeconomic conditions or business cycles. Schlumberger NV, Halliburton Company, and Baker Hughes are some of the biggest oilfield services companies.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NOV($7.76B) has a higher market cap than TGSGY($1.72B). TGSGY has higher P/E ratio than NOV: TGSGY (29.76) vs NOV (7.88). TGSGY YTD gains are higher at: -6.272 vs. NOV (-7.807). NOV has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 1B vs. TGSGY (403M). NOV has more cash in the bank: 816M vs. TGSGY (144M). TGSGY has less debt than NOV: TGSGY (119M) vs NOV (2.38B). NOV has higher revenues than TGSGY: NOV (8.58B) vs TGSGY (734M).
NOVTGSGYNOV / TGSGY
Capitalization7.76B1.72B451%
EBITDA1B403M249%
Gain YTD-7.807-6.272124%
P/E Ratio7.8829.7626%
Revenue8.58B734M1,169%
Total Cash816M144M567%
Total Debt2.38B119M1,997%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
NOV vs TGSGY: Fundamental Ratings
NOV
TGSGY
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5052
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
26
Undervalued
25
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100100
SMR RATING
1..100
7178
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5849
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
35100
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5050

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TGSGY's Valuation (25) in the null industry is in the same range as NOV (26) in the Oilfield Services Or Equipment industry. This means that TGSGY’s stock grew similarly to NOV’s over the last 12 months.

TGSGY's Profit vs Risk Rating (100) in the null industry is in the same range as NOV (100) in the Oilfield Services Or Equipment industry. This means that TGSGY’s stock grew similarly to NOV’s over the last 12 months.

NOV's SMR Rating (71) in the Oilfield Services Or Equipment industry is in the same range as TGSGY (78) in the null industry. This means that NOV’s stock grew similarly to TGSGY’s over the last 12 months.

TGSGY's Price Growth Rating (49) in the null industry is in the same range as NOV (58) in the Oilfield Services Or Equipment industry. This means that TGSGY’s stock grew similarly to NOV’s over the last 12 months.

NOV's P/E Growth Rating (35) in the Oilfield Services Or Equipment industry is somewhat better than the same rating for TGSGY (100) in the null industry. This means that NOV’s stock grew somewhat faster than TGSGY’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
NOVTGSGY
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
79%
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
60%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
72%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
75%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
71%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
72%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
75%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
72%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
72%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
62%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
70%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
62%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
74%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
65%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 7 days ago
73%
Bearish Trend 7 days ago
65%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
82%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
78%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
75%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
71%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
NOV
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
TGSGY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
RGWCX23.780.27
+1.15%
Victory RS Growth C
FSPGX41.930.47
+1.13%
Fidelity Large Cap Growth Idx
JSGZX16.450.15
+0.92%
JPMorgan Small Cap Growth R2
ASGTX5.300.04
+0.76%
Transamerica Small Cap Growth A
WWSYX20.660.07
+0.34%
Westwood Quality SmallCap Fund Ultra

NOV and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, NOV has been closely correlated with HAL. These tickers have moved in lockstep 83% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if NOV jumps, then HAL could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To NOV
1D Price
Change %
NOV100%
-0.91%
HAL - NOV
83%
Closely correlated
-0.88%
SLB - NOV
82%
Closely correlated
+1.28%
CHX - NOV
81%
Closely correlated
-0.74%
BKR - NOV
76%
Closely correlated
-0.48%
WFRD - NOV
75%
Closely correlated
-2.11%
More

TGSGY and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, TGSGY has been loosely correlated with SUBCY. These tickers have moved in lockstep 38% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if TGSGY jumps, then SUBCY could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To TGSGY
1D Price
Change %
TGSGY100%
+2.51%
SUBCY - TGSGY
38%
Loosely correlated
+0.98%
NCSM - TGSGY
29%
Poorly correlated
N/A
BKR - TGSGY
29%
Poorly correlated
-0.48%
SLB - TGSGY
28%
Poorly correlated
+1.28%
NOV - TGSGY
28%
Poorly correlated
-0.91%
More