NOTV
Price
$0.94
Change
+$0.07 (+8.05%)
Updated
Dec 3 closing price
Capitalization
32.3M
69 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
XGN
Price
$7.28
Change
+$0.18 (+2.54%)
Updated
Dec 3 closing price
Capitalization
164.99M
109 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

NOTV vs XGN

Header iconNOTV vs XGN Comparison
Open Charts NOTV vs XGNBanner chart's image
Inotiv
Price$0.94
Change+$0.07 (+8.05%)
Volume$623.56K
Capitalization32.3M
Exagen
Price$7.28
Change+$0.18 (+2.54%)
Volume$250.39K
Capitalization164.99M
NOTV vs XGN Comparison Chart in %
NOTV
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
XGN
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
NOTV vs. XGN commentary
Dec 04, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NOTV is a Hold and XGN is a StrongBuy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Dec 04, 2025
Stock price -- (NOTV: $0.86 vs. XGN: $7.11)
Brand notoriety: NOTV and XGN are both not notable
Both companies represent the Medical Specialties industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: NOTV: 24% vs. XGN: 55%
Market capitalization -- NOTV: $32.3M vs. XGN: $164.99M
NOTV [@Medical Specialties] is valued at $32.3M. XGN’s [@Medical Specialties] market capitalization is $164.99M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Medical Specialties] industry ranges from $3.82T to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Medical Specialties] industry is $12.57B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

NOTV’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileXGN’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • NOTV’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • XGN’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, XGN is a better buy in the long-term than NOTV.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

NOTV’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while XGN’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • NOTV’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 3 bearish.
  • XGN’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 6 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, NOTV is a better buy in the short-term than XGN.

Price Growth

NOTV (@Medical Specialties) experienced а +3.21% price change this week, while XGN (@Medical Specialties) price change was -7.66% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Medical Specialties industry was -0.29%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +2.65%, and the average quarterly price growth was +28.81%.

Reported Earning Dates

NOTV is expected to report earnings on Feb 11, 2026.

XGN is expected to report earnings on Mar 23, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Medical Specialties (-0.29% weekly)

Medical specialties are companies that make equipment used by the health care industry. Equipment manufactured and distributed by these companies include dialysis machines, blood analysis equipment, surgical equipment, dental instruments, and diagnostic tools, among other items. Large companies typically aim to produce and distribute high-quality products across a broad market spectrum. Smaller firms are more likely to specialize in a particular market segment. Due to the industry’s close association with medical treatments, they typically have low sensitivity to macroeconomic fluctuations. Within this industry, Abbott Laboratories, Medtronic Plc and Thermo Fisher Scientific Inc. are some of the companies with multi-billion market capitalizations in the U.S. stock markets.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
XGN($165M) has a higher market cap than NOTV($32.3M). XGN YTD gains are higher at: 73.415 vs. NOTV (-79.200). NOTV has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 21.2M vs. XGN (-12.39M). XGN has more cash in the bank: 30M vs. NOTV (6.22M). XGN has less debt than NOTV: XGN (25.2M) vs NOTV (448M). NOTV has higher revenues than XGN: NOTV (505M) vs XGN (58.9M).
NOTVXGNNOTV / XGN
Capitalization32.3M165M20%
EBITDA21.2M-12.39M-171%
Gain YTD-79.20073.415-108%
P/E RatioN/AN/A-
Revenue505M58.9M857%
Total Cash6.22M30M21%
Total Debt448M25.2M1,778%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
NOTV vs XGN: Fundamental Ratings
NOTV
XGN
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
81
Overvalued
47
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100100
SMR RATING
1..100
9798
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
9560
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
66100
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
24n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

XGN's Valuation (47) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for NOTV (81) in the Servicestothe Health Industry industry. This means that XGN’s stock grew somewhat faster than NOTV’s over the last 12 months.

XGN's Profit vs Risk Rating (100) in the null industry is in the same range as NOTV (100) in the Servicestothe Health Industry industry. This means that XGN’s stock grew similarly to NOTV’s over the last 12 months.

NOTV's SMR Rating (97) in the Servicestothe Health Industry industry is in the same range as XGN (98) in the null industry. This means that NOTV’s stock grew similarly to XGN’s over the last 12 months.

XGN's Price Growth Rating (60) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for NOTV (95) in the Servicestothe Health Industry industry. This means that XGN’s stock grew somewhat faster than NOTV’s over the last 12 months.

NOTV's P/E Growth Rating (66) in the Servicestothe Health Industry industry is somewhat better than the same rating for XGN (100) in the null industry. This means that NOTV’s stock grew somewhat faster than XGN’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
NOTVXGN
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 7 days ago
88%
Bullish Trend 7 days ago
89%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 7 days ago
77%
Bullish Trend 7 days ago
82%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 7 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 7 days ago
86%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 7 days ago
85%
Bearish Trend 7 days ago
90%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 7 days ago
86%
Bullish Trend 7 days ago
86%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 7 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 7 days ago
86%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 7 days ago
87%
Bullish Trend 7 days ago
82%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 11 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 11 days ago
87%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 7 days ago
83%
Bullish Trend 7 days ago
89%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 7 days ago
89%
Bearish Trend 7 days ago
85%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
NOTV
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
XGN
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
AMGDF0.83N/A
N/A
Aston Martin Lagonda Global Holdings plc.
BCSO52.00N/A
N/A
Bancorp Southern Indiana
CFEIY5.24N/A
N/A
China Feihe Limited
PETFF1.04N/A
N/A
PTT Public Company Ltd.
TMASF0.13N/A
N/A
Temas Resources Corp.

NOTV and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, NOTV has been loosely correlated with CRL. These tickers have moved in lockstep 53% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if NOTV jumps, then CRL could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To NOTV
1D Price
Change %
NOTV100%
-2.28%
CRL - NOTV
53%
Loosely correlated
-0.73%
IQV - NOTV
46%
Loosely correlated
-1.23%
A - NOTV
42%
Loosely correlated
-0.85%
ICUI - NOTV
40%
Loosely correlated
+0.21%
RVTY - NOTV
40%
Loosely correlated
+0.33%
More

XGN and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that XGN and QDEL have been poorly correlated (+26% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that XGN and QDEL's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To XGN
1D Price
Change %
XGN100%
-5.20%
QDEL - XGN
26%
Poorly correlated
+0.23%
NOTV - XGN
26%
Poorly correlated
-2.28%
MXCT - XGN
25%
Poorly correlated
-3.99%
ISRG - XGN
25%
Poorly correlated
+0.06%
DRIO - XGN
24%
Poorly correlated
-0.47%
More