NOTE
Price
$1.19
Change
+$0.14 (+13.33%)
Updated
Dec 18 closing price
103 days until earnings call
NTCYF
Price
$41.87
Change
+$12.87 (+44.38%)
Updated
Jul 22 closing price
Ad is loading...

NOTE vs NTCYF

Header iconNOTE vs NTCYF Comparison
Open Charts NOTE vs NTCYFBanner chart's image
FiscalNote Holdings
Price$1.19
Change+$0.14 (+13.33%)
Volume$8.76M
CapitalizationN/A
Netcompany Group AS
Price$41.87
Change+$12.87 (+44.38%)
Volume$100
CapitalizationN/A
NOTE vs NTCYF Comparison Chart
Loading...
NOTE
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
NOTE vs. NTCYF commentary
Dec 19, 2024

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NOTE is a StrongBuy and NTCYF is a Hold.

COMPARISON
Comparison
Dec 19, 2024
Stock price -- (NOTE: $1.19 vs. NTCYF: $41.87)
Brand notoriety: NOTE and NTCYF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Information Technology Services industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: NOTE: 908% vs. NTCYF: 100%
Market capitalization -- NOTE: $172.18M vs. NTCYF: $2.5B
NOTE [@Information Technology Services] is valued at $172.18M. NTCYF’s [@Information Technology Services] market capitalization is $2.5B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Information Technology Services] industry ranges from $223.48B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Information Technology Services] industry is $9.82B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

NOTE’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileNTCYF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • NOTE’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • NTCYF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, NOTE is a better buy in the long-term than NTCYF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

NOTE’s TA Score shows that 6 TA indicator(s) are bullish.

  • NOTE’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 3 bearish.

Price Growth

NOTE (@Information Technology Services) experienced а +46.91% price change this week, while NTCYF (@Information Technology Services) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Information Technology Services industry was -3.16%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +0.14%, and the average quarterly price growth was +22.91%.

Reported Earning Dates

NOTE is expected to report earnings on Apr 01, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Information Technology Services (-3.16% weekly)

The industry, whose total market cap runs into trillions, makes hardware/software that allows data to be stored, retrieved, transmitted, and manipulated on computers. With the ever-increasing relevance of data, the information technology (IT) industry has gained momentous growth over the years, and continues to thrive on innovation. Some of the behemoths in the industry are International Business Machines Corporation, Accenture, and VMware, Inc.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NTCYF($2.5B) has a higher market cap than NOTE($172M). NTCYF has higher P/E ratio than NOTE: NTCYF (40.00) vs NOTE (4.86). NTCYF YTD gains are higher at: 44.379 vs. NOTE (4.386). NOTE has less debt than NTCYF: NOTE (252M) vs NTCYF (2.46B).
NOTENTCYFNOTE / NTCYF
Capitalization172M2.5B7%
EBITDAN/A1.05B-
Gain YTD4.38644.37910%
P/E Ratio4.8640.0012%
RevenueN/A6.45B-
Total CashN/A32.6M-
Total Debt252M2.46B10%
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
NOTE
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
80%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
55%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
49%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
49%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
53%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
46%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
68%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 9 days ago
75%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
63%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
57%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
NOTE
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
AAPL248.05-5.43
-2.14%
Apple
SPY586.28-18.01
-2.98%
SPDR® S&P 500® ETF Trust
BTC.X100041.540000-6099.062500
-5.75%
Bitcoin cryptocurrency
TSLA440.13-39.73
-8.28%
Tesla
GME28.55-2.71
-8.67%
GameStop Corp

NOTE and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that NOTE and CNDT have been poorly correlated (+21% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that NOTE and CNDT's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To NOTE
1D Price
Change %
NOTE100%
+13.33%
CNDT - NOTE
21%
Poorly correlated
-2.31%
AUR - NOTE
19%
Poorly correlated
-11.17%
NABL - NOTE
18%
Poorly correlated
-2.59%
TASK - NOTE
14%
Poorly correlated
-7.88%
BBAI - NOTE
13%
Poorly correlated
-7.94%
More

NTCYF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that NTCYF and MGIC have been poorly correlated (+24% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that NTCYF and MGIC's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To NTCYF
1D Price
Change %
NTCYF100%
N/A
MGIC - NTCYF
24%
Poorly correlated
-2.32%
HCKT - NTCYF
23%
Poorly correlated
-4.09%
CSPI - NTCYF
20%
Poorly correlated
-9.34%
NOTE - NTCYF
19%
Poorly correlated
+13.33%
FWFW - NTCYF
13%
Poorly correlated
+66.67%
More