NOTE
Price
$0.52
Change
+$0.01 (+1.96%)
Updated
Jun 16, 01:28 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
81.48M
52 days until earnings call
NTCYF
Price
$42.85
Change
+$2.15 (+5.28%)
Updated
Mar 6 closing price
Capitalization
2.14B
Interact to see
Advertisement

NOTE vs NTCYF

Header iconNOTE vs NTCYF Comparison
Open Charts NOTE vs NTCYFBanner chart's image
FiscalNote Holdings
Price$0.52
Change+$0.01 (+1.96%)
Volume$1.85K
Capitalization81.48M
Netcompany Group AS
Price$42.85
Change+$2.15 (+5.28%)
Volume$200
Capitalization2.14B
NOTE vs NTCYF Comparison Chart
Loading...
NOTE
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
NOTE vs. NTCYF commentary
Jun 16, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NOTE is a Buy and NTCYF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jun 16, 2025
Stock price -- (NOTE: $0.51 vs. NTCYF: $42.85)
Brand notoriety: NOTE and NTCYF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Information Technology Services industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: NOTE: 225% vs. NTCYF: 100%
Market capitalization -- NOTE: $81.48M vs. NTCYF: $2.14B
NOTE [@Information Technology Services] is valued at $81.48M. NTCYF’s [@Information Technology Services] market capitalization is $2.14B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Information Technology Services] industry ranges from $257.65B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Information Technology Services] industry is $10.51B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

NOTE’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileNTCYF’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • NOTE’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • NTCYF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, NTCYF is a better buy in the long-term than NOTE.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

NOTE’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish.

  • NOTE’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 3 bearish.

Price Growth

NOTE (@Information Technology Services) experienced а -16.94% price change this week, while NTCYF (@Information Technology Services) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Information Technology Services industry was +3.07%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +2.64%, and the average quarterly price growth was +2.32%.

Reported Earning Dates

NOTE is expected to report earnings on Aug 07, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Information Technology Services (+3.07% weekly)

The industry, whose total market cap runs into trillions, makes hardware/software that allows data to be stored, retrieved, transmitted, and manipulated on computers. With the ever-increasing relevance of data, the information technology (IT) industry has gained momentous growth over the years, and continues to thrive on innovation. Some of the behemoths in the industry are International Business Machines Corporation, Accenture, and VMware, Inc.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NTCYF($2.14B) has a higher market cap than NOTE($81.5M). NTCYF has higher P/E ratio than NOTE: NTCYF (27.37) vs NOTE (9.43). NTCYF YTD gains are higher at: 2.341 vs. NOTE (-51.869). NTCYF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 1.1B vs. NOTE (-4.34M). NTCYF has more cash in the bank: 185M vs. NOTE (46.3M). NOTE has less debt than NTCYF: NOTE (143M) vs NTCYF (2.46B). NTCYF has higher revenues than NOTE: NTCYF (6.69B) vs NOTE (116M).
NOTENTCYFNOTE / NTCYF
Capitalization81.5M2.14B4%
EBITDA-4.34M1.1B-0%
Gain YTD-51.8692.341-2,216%
P/E Ratio9.4327.3734%
Revenue116M6.69B2%
Total Cash46.3M185M25%
Total Debt143M2.46B6%
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
NOTE
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
61%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
56%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
49%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
67%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
73%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
75%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
59%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
59%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
NOTE
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
RFM13.96-0.08
-0.54%
RiverNorth Flexible Municipal Income Fund
RSPS29.98-0.35
-1.15%
Invesco S&P 500® Eql Wt Cnsm Stapl ETF
IMCV74.39-0.91
-1.21%
iShares Morningstar Mid-Cap Value ETF
SLYG86.05-1.60
-1.83%
SPDR® S&P 600 Small Cap Growth ETF
NVDG12.30-0.52
-4.06%
Leverage Shares 2X Long Nvda Daily ETF

NOTE and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that NOTE and CDW have been poorly correlated (+25% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that NOTE and CDW's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To NOTE
1D Price
Change %
NOTE100%
-2.89%
CDW - NOTE
25%
Poorly correlated
-2.48%
XRX - NOTE
22%
Poorly correlated
-3.37%
APLD - NOTE
22%
Poorly correlated
-10.63%
PENG - NOTE
22%
Poorly correlated
-3.79%
DMRC - NOTE
21%
Poorly correlated
-5.65%
More

NTCYF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that NTCYF and MGIC have been poorly correlated (+24% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that NTCYF and MGIC's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To NTCYF
1D Price
Change %
NTCYF100%
N/A
MGIC - NTCYF
24%
Poorly correlated
-3.55%
HCKT - NTCYF
23%
Poorly correlated
-2.43%
CSPI - NTCYF
20%
Poorly correlated
-2.51%
NOTE - NTCYF
19%
Poorly correlated
-2.89%
FWFW - NTCYF
13%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More