Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
NOSGX vs WCMFX
NOSGX vs WCMFX Comparison
Open Charts NOSGX vs WCMFX
Northern Small Cap Value
Price$13.84
Change-$0.02 (-0.14%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets661.49M
WCM SMID Quality Val Fd Institutional
Price$11.32
Change+$0.05 (+0.44%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets21.79M
NOSGX vs WCMFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
NOSGX vs. WCMFX commentary
Oct 19, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NOSGX is a Hold and WCMFX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NOSGX has more cash in the bank: 661M vs. WCMFX (21.8M). NOSGX pays higher dividends than WCMFX: NOSGX (0.84) vs WCMFX (0.00). NOSGX was incepted earlier than WCMFX: NOSGX (32 years) vs WCMFX (6 years). WCMFX (1.45) is less costly to investors than NOSGX (0.66). NOSGX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 26.80 vs. WCMFX (15.00). NOSGX has a lower initial minimum investment than WCMFX: NOSGX (2500) vs WCMFX (100000). WCMFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -20.62 vs. NOSGX (-34.79). WCMFX return over 5 years is better than : 23.45 vs. NOSGX (-14.67).
| NOSGX | WCMFX | NOSGX / WCMFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.51 | 0.90 | 57% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.66 | 1.45 | 46% |
| Fund Existence | 32 years | 6 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 6.380 | -5.509 | -116% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 100000 | 3% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 661M | 21.8M | 3,032% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.84 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -34.79 | -20.62 | 169% |
| Returns for 3 years | -23.04 | 16.46 | -140% |
| Returns for 5 years | -14.67 | 23.45 | -63% |
| Returns for 10 years | -27.63 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement