Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
NOSGX vs SSGSX
NOSGX vs SSGSX Comparison
Open Charts NOSGX vs SSGSX
Northern Small Cap Value
Price$14.02
Change-$0.02 (-0.14%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets681.69M
Victory Sycamore Small Company Opp A
Price$47.38
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets5.64B
NOSGX vs SSGSX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
NOSGX vs. SSGSX commentary
Sep 09, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NOSGX is a Buy and SSGSX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SSGSX has more cash in the bank: 5.64B vs. NOSGX (682M). NOSGX pays higher dividends than SSGSX: NOSGX (0.85) vs SSGSX (0.47). NOSGX was incepted earlier than SSGSX: NOSGX (31 years) vs SSGSX (26 years). SSGSX (1.26) is less costly to investors than NOSGX (0.66). SSGSX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 37.00 vs. NOSGX (26.80). NOSGX (2500) and SSGSX (2500) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. SSGSX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -0.11 vs. NOSGX (-29.32). SSGSX return over 5 years is better than : 25.10 vs. NOSGX (-9.86).
| NOSGX | SSGSX | NOSGX / SSGSX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.51 | 1.26 | 40% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.66 | 1.26 | 52% |
| Fund Existence | 31 years | 26 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 7.763 | 2.046 | 379% |
| Front Load | N/A | 6% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 2500 | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 682M | 5.64B | 12% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.85 | 0.47 | 178% |
| Returns for 1 year | -29.32 | -0.11 | 25,739% |
| Returns for 3 years | -25.07 | 0.11 | -23,119% |
| Returns for 5 years | -9.86 | 25.10 | -39% |
| Returns for 10 years | -23.38 | 25.48 | -92% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement