Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
NOSGX vs SSGSX
NOSGX vs SSGSX Comparison
Open Charts NOSGX vs SSGSX
Northern Small Cap Value
Price$13.84
Change-$0.02 (-0.14%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets661.49M
Victory Sycamore Small Company Opp A
Price$45.95
Change+$0.15 (+0.33%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets5.31B
NOSGX vs SSGSX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
NOSGX vs. SSGSX commentary
Oct 19, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NOSGX is a Hold and SSGSX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SSGSX has more cash in the bank: 5.31B vs. NOSGX (661M). NOSGX pays higher dividends than SSGSX: NOSGX (0.84) vs SSGSX (0.48). NOSGX was incepted earlier than SSGSX: NOSGX (32 years) vs SSGSX (27 years). SSGSX (1.26) is less costly to investors than NOSGX (0.66). SSGSX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 37.00 vs. NOSGX (26.80). NOSGX (2500) and SSGSX (2500) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. SSGSX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -8.48 vs. NOSGX (-34.79). SSGSX return over 5 years is better than : 18.06 vs. NOSGX (-14.67).
| NOSGX | SSGSX | NOSGX / SSGSX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.51 | 1.26 | 40% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.66 | 1.26 | 52% |
| Fund Existence | 32 years | 27 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 6.380 | -1.034 | -617% |
| Front Load | N/A | 6% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 2500 | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 661M | 5.31B | 12% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.84 | 0.48 | 177% |
| Returns for 1 year | -34.79 | -8.48 | 410% |
| Returns for 3 years | -23.04 | 1.10 | -2,099% |
| Returns for 5 years | -14.67 | 18.06 | -81% |
| Returns for 10 years | -27.63 | 18.76 | -147% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers