Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
NOSGX vs SSGSX
NOSGX vs SSGSX Comparison
Open Charts NOSGX vs SSGSX
Northern Small Cap Value
Price$13.29
Change+$0.10 (+0.76%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets685.31M
Victory Sycamore Small Company Opp A
Price$45.47
Change+$0.28 (+0.62%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets5.82B
NOSGX vs SSGSX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
NOSGX vs. SSGSX commentary
Jul 07, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NOSGX is a Buy and SSGSX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SSGSX has more cash in the bank: 5.82B vs. NOSGX (685M). NOSGX pays higher dividends than SSGSX: NOSGX (0.89) vs SSGSX (0.51). NOSGX was incepted earlier than SSGSX: NOSGX (31 years) vs SSGSX (26 years). SSGSX (1.26) is less costly to investors than NOSGX (0.66). SSGSX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 37.00 vs. NOSGX (18.61). NOSGX (2500) and SSGSX (2500) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. SSGSX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -1.26 vs. NOSGX (-30.21). SSGSX return over 5 years is better than : 29.33 vs. NOSGX (-8.09).
| NOSGX | SSGSX | NOSGX / SSGSX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.51 | 1.26 | 40% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.66 | 1.26 | 52% |
| Fund Existence | 31 years | 26 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 2.152 | -2.068 | -104% |
| Front Load | N/A | 6% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 2500 | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 685M | 5.82B | 12% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.89 | 0.51 | 176% |
| Returns for 1 year | -30.21 | -1.26 | 2,395% |
| Returns for 3 years | -24.76 | 2.38 | -1,041% |
| Returns for 5 years | -8.09 | 29.33 | -28% |
| Returns for 10 years | -32.45 | 16.52 | -196% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement