NOPMF
Price
$10.68
Change
+$0.22 (+2.10%)
Updated
Jul 3 closing price
Capitalization
290.84M
SKFOF
Price
$263.94
Change
-$6.63 (-2.45%)
Updated
Jul 3 closing price
Capitalization
47.92B
Interact to see
Advertisement

NOPMF vs SKFOF

Header iconNOPMF vs SKFOF Comparison
Open Charts NOPMF vs SKFOFBanner chart's image
Neo Performance Materials
Price$10.68
Change+$0.22 (+2.10%)
Volume$21.43K
Capitalization290.84M
Sika Finanz Ag
Price$263.94
Change-$6.63 (-2.45%)
Volume$354
Capitalization47.92B
NOPMF vs SKFOF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
NOPMF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
SKFOF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
NOPMF vs. SKFOF commentary
Jul 07, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NOPMF is a Buy and SKFOF is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 07, 2025
Stock price -- (NOPMF: $10.68 vs. SKFOF: $263.94)
Brand notoriety: NOPMF and SKFOF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Chemicals: Specialty industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: NOPMF: 42% vs. SKFOF: 41%
Market capitalization -- NOPMF: $290.84M vs. SKFOF: $47.92B
NOPMF [@Chemicals: Specialty] is valued at $290.84M. SKFOF’s [@Chemicals: Specialty] market capitalization is $47.92B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Chemicals: Specialty] industry ranges from $223.16B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Chemicals: Specialty] industry is $9.36B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

NOPMF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileSKFOF’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • NOPMF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • SKFOF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, NOPMF is a better buy in the long-term than SKFOF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

NOPMF’s TA Score shows that 6 TA indicator(s) are bullish while SKFOF’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • NOPMF’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 3 bearish.
  • SKFOF’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, NOPMF is a better buy in the short-term than SKFOF.

Price Growth

NOPMF (@Chemicals: Specialty) experienced а +4.13% price change this week, while SKFOF (@Chemicals: Specialty) price change was -1.41% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Chemicals: Specialty industry was +3.00%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +5.44%, and the average quarterly price growth was +3.72%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Chemicals: Specialty (+3.00% weekly)

The specialty chemicals sector includes companies that produce chemicals and industrial gases, which are of relatively high-value, often made to customer specifications. Examples of specialty chemicals are electronic chemicals, industrial gases, coatings, adhesives and sealants, industrial and institutional cleaning chemicals. The products are often valued on the basis of their purposes/performances rather than for their composition. Linde Plc, Ecolab Inc., Air Products and Chemicals, Inc., and Dow, Inc. are some of the largest companies making specialty chemicals.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SKFOF($47.9B) has a higher market cap than NOPMF($291M). SKFOF has higher P/E ratio than NOPMF: SKFOF (36.63) vs NOPMF (9.78). NOPMF YTD gains are higher at: 93.684 vs. SKFOF (11.560). SKFOF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 1.94B vs. NOPMF (22.8M). SKFOF has more cash in the bank: 1.88B vs. NOPMF (146M). NOPMF has less debt than SKFOF: NOPMF (36.8M) vs SKFOF (3.9B). SKFOF has higher revenues than NOPMF: SKFOF (10.5B) vs NOPMF (610M).
NOPMFSKFOFNOPMF / SKFOF
Capitalization291M47.9B1%
EBITDA22.8M1.94B1%
Gain YTD93.68411.560810%
P/E Ratio9.7836.6327%
Revenue610M10.5B6%
Total Cash146M1.88B8%
Total Debt36.8M3.9B1%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
NOPMF vs SKFOF: Fundamental Ratings
NOPMF
SKFOF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
49
Fair valued
85
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
7169
SMR RATING
1..100
9193
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
3553
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
4988
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
8595

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

NOPMF's Valuation (49) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for SKFOF (85). This means that NOPMF’s stock grew somewhat faster than SKFOF’s over the last 12 months.

SKFOF's Profit vs Risk Rating (69) in the null industry is in the same range as NOPMF (71). This means that SKFOF’s stock grew similarly to NOPMF’s over the last 12 months.

NOPMF's SMR Rating (91) in the null industry is in the same range as SKFOF (93). This means that NOPMF’s stock grew similarly to SKFOF’s over the last 12 months.

NOPMF's Price Growth Rating (35) in the null industry is in the same range as SKFOF (53). This means that NOPMF’s stock grew similarly to SKFOF’s over the last 12 months.

NOPMF's P/E Growth Rating (49) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for SKFOF (88). This means that NOPMF’s stock grew somewhat faster than SKFOF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
NOPMFSKFOF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
81%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
74%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
55%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
72%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
59%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
75%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
55%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
75%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
64%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
77%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
60%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 11 days ago
75%
Bullish Trend 10 days ago
69%
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
65%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
87%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
85%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
83%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
64%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
NOPMF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
SKFOF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
JATAX68.361.07
+1.59%
Janus Henderson Glb Tech and Innovt A
CLVRX34.820.15
+0.43%
Calvert US Large Cap Value Rspnb Idx R6
TSVIX28.500.10
+0.35%
Transamerica Small/Mid Cap Value I
FNDMX13.370.03
+0.22%
Fidelity Series Sust Non-US Dev Mrkt Fd
DEQAX14.29N/A
N/A
BNY Mellon Global Equity Income - A

NOPMF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, NOPMF has been loosely correlated with OCLDF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 36% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if NOPMF jumps, then OCLDF could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To NOPMF
1D Price
Change %
NOPMF100%
+2.14%
OCLDF - NOPMF
36%
Loosely correlated
N/A
CGIFF - NOPMF
22%
Poorly correlated
+0.18%
SXYAY - NOPMF
21%
Poorly correlated
-2.58%
HDSN - NOPMF
20%
Poorly correlated
+2.07%
SKFOF - NOPMF
20%
Poorly correlated
-2.45%
More

SKFOF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SKFOF has been loosely correlated with SXYAY. These tickers have moved in lockstep 47% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if SKFOF jumps, then SXYAY could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To SKFOF
1D Price
Change %
SKFOF100%
-2.45%
SXYAY - SKFOF
47%
Loosely correlated
-2.58%
SHECF - SKFOF
41%
Loosely correlated
+0.45%
BASFY - SKFOF
30%
Poorly correlated
-2.56%
CGIFF - SKFOF
26%
Poorly correlated
+0.18%
NVZMF - SKFOF
25%
Poorly correlated
-3.34%
More