NOPMF
Price
$14.68
Change
-$1.91 (-11.51%)
Updated
Feb 3 closing price
Capitalization
609.25M
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
OCLDY
Price
$14.00
Change
+$0.12 (+0.86%)
Updated
Oct 3 closing price
Capitalization
8.37B
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

NOPMF vs OCLDY

Header iconNOPMF vs OCLDY Comparison
Open Charts NOPMF vs OCLDYBanner chart's image
Neo Performance Materials
Price$14.68
Change-$1.91 (-11.51%)
Volume$23.9K
Capitalization609.25M
Orica
Price$14.00
Change+$0.12 (+0.86%)
Volume$710
Capitalization8.37B
NOPMF vs OCLDY Comparison Chart in %
NOPMF
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
OCLDY
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
NOPMF vs. OCLDY commentary
Feb 05, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NOPMF is a StrongBuy and OCLDY is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Feb 05, 2026
Stock price -- (NOPMF: $14.68 vs. OCLDY: $17.23)
Brand notoriety: NOPMF and OCLDY are both not notable
Both companies represent the Chemicals: Specialty industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: NOPMF: 68% vs. OCLDY: 53%
Market capitalization -- NOPMF: $609.25M vs. OCLDY: $8.37B
NOPMF [@Chemicals: Specialty] is valued at $609.25M. OCLDY’s [@Chemicals: Specialty] market capitalization is $8.37B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Chemicals: Specialty] industry ranges from $216.46B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Chemicals: Specialty] industry is $8.97B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

NOPMF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileOCLDY’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • NOPMF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • OCLDY’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, OCLDY is a better buy in the long-term than NOPMF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

NOPMF’s TA Score shows that 6 TA indicator(s) are bullish while OCLDY’s TA Score has 2 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • NOPMF’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • OCLDY’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 2 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, NOPMF is a better buy in the short-term than OCLDY.

Price Growth

NOPMF (@Chemicals: Specialty) experienced а +1.17% price change this week, while OCLDY (@Chemicals: Specialty) price change was -9.32% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Chemicals: Specialty industry was +1.59%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +4.62%, and the average quarterly price growth was +17.97%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Chemicals: Specialty (+1.59% weekly)

The specialty chemicals sector includes companies that produce chemicals and industrial gases, which are of relatively high-value, often made to customer specifications. Examples of specialty chemicals are electronic chemicals, industrial gases, coatings, adhesives and sealants, industrial and institutional cleaning chemicals. The products are often valued on the basis of their purposes/performances rather than for their composition. Linde Plc, Ecolab Inc., Air Products and Chemicals, Inc., and Dow, Inc. are some of the largest companies making specialty chemicals.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
OCLDY($8.37B) has a higher market cap than NOPMF($609M). NOPMF has higher P/E ratio than OCLDY: NOPMF (80.71) vs OCLDY (74.61). NOPMF YTD gains are higher at: 29.912 vs. OCLDY (3.474). OCLDY has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 1.12B vs. NOPMF (29.3M). OCLDY has more cash in the bank: 747M vs. NOPMF (61.5M). NOPMF has less debt than OCLDY: NOPMF (93.8M) vs OCLDY (3.01B). OCLDY has higher revenues than NOPMF: OCLDY (8.15B) vs NOPMF (493M).
NOPMFOCLDYNOPMF / OCLDY
Capitalization609M8.37B7%
EBITDA29.3M1.12B3%
Gain YTD29.9123.474861%
P/E Ratio80.7174.61108%
Revenue493M8.15B6%
Total Cash61.5M747M8%
Total Debt93.8M3.01B3%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
NOPMF vs OCLDY: Fundamental Ratings
NOPMF
OCLDY
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
2797
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
51
Fair valued
42
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
8127
SMR RATING
1..100
9095
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4043
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
443
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
1750

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

OCLDY's Valuation (42) in the null industry is in the same range as NOPMF (51). This means that OCLDY’s stock grew similarly to NOPMF’s over the last 12 months.

OCLDY's Profit vs Risk Rating (27) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for NOPMF (81). This means that OCLDY’s stock grew somewhat faster than NOPMF’s over the last 12 months.

NOPMF's SMR Rating (90) in the null industry is in the same range as OCLDY (95). This means that NOPMF’s stock grew similarly to OCLDY’s over the last 12 months.

NOPMF's Price Growth Rating (40) in the null industry is in the same range as OCLDY (43). This means that NOPMF’s stock grew similarly to OCLDY’s over the last 12 months.

OCLDY's P/E Growth Rating (3) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for NOPMF (44). This means that OCLDY’s stock grew somewhat faster than NOPMF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
NOPMFOCLDY
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
76%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
41%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
75%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
63%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
69%
N/A
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
69%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
48%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
74%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
39%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
75%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
48%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 7 days ago
75%
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
71%
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
75%
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
82%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
44%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
NOPMF
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
OCLDY
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
BKUI49.76N/A
N/A
BNY Mellon Ultra Short Income ETF
EMES24.27N/A
N/A
Harbor Emerging Markets Select ETF
BBCB45.76-0.06
-0.14%
JPMorgan BetaBuilders $ InvmGrdCorpBdETF
FFEB57.18-0.20
-0.35%
FT Vest US Equity Buffer ETF Feb
FAI40.56-1.18
-2.83%
First Trust Exchange-Traded Fund II

NOPMF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that NOPMF and LWLG have been poorly correlated (+29% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that NOPMF and LWLG's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To NOPMF
1D Price
Change %
NOPMF100%
+5.61%
LWLG - NOPMF
29%
Poorly correlated
+11.85%
IOSP - NOPMF
27%
Poorly correlated
+0.55%
SXYAY - NOPMF
27%
Poorly correlated
+0.52%
DOW - NOPMF
27%
Poorly correlated
+5.57%
ECVT - NOPMF
27%
Poorly correlated
+2.13%
More

OCLDY and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that OCLDY and IFF have been poorly correlated (+23% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that OCLDY and IFF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To OCLDY
1D Price
Change %
OCLDY100%
N/A
IFF - OCLDY
23%
Poorly correlated
+0.90%
TSE - OCLDY
23%
Poorly correlated
+0.18%
CGIFF - OCLDY
22%
Poorly correlated
N/A
ELMTY - OCLDY
22%
Poorly correlated
N/A
NOPMF - OCLDY
10%
Poorly correlated
+5.61%
More