NOPMF
Price
$11.94
Change
-$0.18 (-1.49%)
Updated
Sep 5 closing price
Capitalization
499.5M
OCLDF
Price
$12.25
Change
+$2.65 (+27.60%)
Updated
Jul 25 closing price
Capitalization
6.52B
Interact to see
Advertisement

NOPMF vs OCLDF

Header iconNOPMF vs OCLDF Comparison
Open Charts NOPMF vs OCLDFBanner chart's image
Neo Performance Materials
Price$11.94
Change-$0.18 (-1.49%)
Volume$40.81K
Capitalization499.5M
Orica
Price$12.25
Change+$2.65 (+27.60%)
Volume$175
Capitalization6.52B
NOPMF vs OCLDF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
NOPMF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
OCLDF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
NOPMF vs. OCLDF commentary
Sep 08, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NOPMF is a Hold and OCLDF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 08, 2025
Stock price -- (NOPMF: $11.94 vs. OCLDF: $12.25)
Brand notoriety: NOPMF and OCLDF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Chemicals: Specialty industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: NOPMF: 65% vs. OCLDF: 95%
Market capitalization -- NOPMF: $499.5M vs. OCLDF: $6.52B
NOPMF [@Chemicals: Specialty] is valued at $499.5M. OCLDF’s [@Chemicals: Specialty] market capitalization is $6.52B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Chemicals: Specialty] industry ranges from $220.16B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Chemicals: Specialty] industry is $9.05B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

NOPMF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileOCLDF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • NOPMF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • OCLDF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, both NOPMF and OCLDF are a good buy in the long-term.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

NOPMF’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while OCLDF’s TA Score has 2 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • NOPMF’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • OCLDF’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 1 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, OCLDF is a better buy in the short-term than NOPMF.

Price Growth

NOPMF (@Chemicals: Specialty) experienced а -6.65% price change this week, while OCLDF (@Chemicals: Specialty) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Chemicals: Specialty industry was -1.30%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +4.43%, and the average quarterly price growth was +9.18%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Chemicals: Specialty (-1.30% weekly)

The specialty chemicals sector includes companies that produce chemicals and industrial gases, which are of relatively high-value, often made to customer specifications. Examples of specialty chemicals are electronic chemicals, industrial gases, coatings, adhesives and sealants, industrial and institutional cleaning chemicals. The products are often valued on the basis of their purposes/performances rather than for their composition. Linde Plc, Ecolab Inc., Air Products and Chemicals, Inc., and Dow, Inc. are some of the largest companies making specialty chemicals.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
OCLDF($6.52B) has a higher market cap than NOPMF($499M). OCLDF has higher P/E ratio than NOPMF: OCLDF (99.57) vs NOPMF (80.71). NOPMF YTD gains are higher at: 116.453 vs. OCLDF (26.550). OCLDF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 1.04B vs. NOPMF (24.9M). OCLDF has more cash in the bank: 581M vs. NOPMF (80.3M). NOPMF has less debt than OCLDF: NOPMF (97.7M) vs OCLDF (2.52B). OCLDF has higher revenues than NOPMF: OCLDF (7.97B) vs NOPMF (482M).
NOPMFOCLDFNOPMF / OCLDF
Capitalization499M6.52B8%
EBITDA24.9M1.04B2%
Gain YTD116.45326.550439%
P/E Ratio80.7199.5781%
Revenue482M7.97B6%
Total Cash80.3M581M14%
Total Debt97.7M2.52B4%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
NOPMF vs OCLDF: Fundamental Ratings
NOPMF
OCLDF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
49
Fair valued
37
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
71100
SMR RATING
1..100
9396
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
3747
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
402
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
7575

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

OCLDF's Valuation (37) in the null industry is in the same range as NOPMF (49). This means that OCLDF’s stock grew similarly to NOPMF’s over the last 12 months.

NOPMF's Profit vs Risk Rating (71) in the null industry is in the same range as OCLDF (100). This means that NOPMF’s stock grew similarly to OCLDF’s over the last 12 months.

NOPMF's SMR Rating (93) in the null industry is in the same range as OCLDF (96). This means that NOPMF’s stock grew similarly to OCLDF’s over the last 12 months.

NOPMF's Price Growth Rating (37) in the null industry is in the same range as OCLDF (47). This means that NOPMF’s stock grew similarly to OCLDF’s over the last 12 months.

OCLDF's P/E Growth Rating (2) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for NOPMF (40). This means that OCLDF’s stock grew somewhat faster than NOPMF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
NOPMFOCLDF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
73%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
86%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
17%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
81%
N/A
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
74%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
23%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
74%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
23%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
74%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
28%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 13 days ago
76%
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
73%
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
77%
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
63%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
19%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
NOPMF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
OCLDF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
FMFAX92.820.55
+0.60%
Fidelity Advisor Materials A
NBGAX63.030.30
+0.48%
Neuberger Berman Genesis Adv
NBMBX18.920.08
+0.42%
Neuberger Berman Mid Cap Growth Adv
SUHCX22.260.07
+0.32%
DWS Health and Wellness C
FCAUX13.490.04
+0.30%
Fidelity Advisor Climate Action I

NOPMF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, NOPMF has been loosely correlated with OCLDF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 36% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if NOPMF jumps, then OCLDF could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To NOPMF
1D Price
Change %
NOPMF100%
-1.49%
OCLDF - NOPMF
36%
Loosely correlated
N/A
CGIFF - NOPMF
22%
Poorly correlated
-0.23%
SXYAY - NOPMF
21%
Poorly correlated
+1.36%
HDSN - NOPMF
20%
Poorly correlated
-1.54%
SKFOF - NOPMF
20%
Poorly correlated
+1.85%
More

OCLDF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, OCLDF has been loosely correlated with NOPMF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 35% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if OCLDF jumps, then NOPMF could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To OCLDF
1D Price
Change %
OCLDF100%
N/A
NOPMF - OCLDF
35%
Loosely correlated
-1.49%
NNCHY - OCLDF
26%
Poorly correlated
+3.40%
GURE - OCLDF
23%
Poorly correlated
+5.63%
NNUP - OCLDF
11%
Poorly correlated
+4.64%
NVZMF - OCLDF
4%
Poorly correlated
+2.90%
More