NOKBF
Price
$4.33
Change
-$0.12 (-2.70%)
Updated
Dec 17 closing price
ONDS
Price
$1.29
Change
-$0.38 (-22.75%)
Updated
Dec 18, 04:59 PM (EDT)
82 days until earnings call
Ad is loading...

NOKBF vs ONDS

Header iconNOKBF vs ONDS Comparison
Open Charts NOKBF vs ONDSBanner chart's image
Nokia
Price$4.33
Change-$0.12 (-2.70%)
Volume$315.31K
CapitalizationN/A
Ondas Holdings
Price$1.29
Change-$0.38 (-22.75%)
Volume$42.43K
CapitalizationN/A
NOKBF vs ONDS Comparison Chart
Loading...
ONDS
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
NOKBF vs. ONDS commentary
Dec 19, 2024

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NOKBF is a Hold and ONDS is a StrongBuy.

COMPARISON
Comparison
Dec 19, 2024
Stock price -- (NOKBF: $4.33 vs. ONDS: $1.67)
Brand notoriety: NOKBF and ONDS are both not notable
Both companies represent the Telecommunications Equipment industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: NOKBF: 48% vs. ONDS: 545%
Market capitalization -- NOKBF: $21.85B vs. ONDS: $81.95M
NOKBF [@Telecommunications Equipment] is valued at $21.85B. ONDS’s [@Telecommunications Equipment] market capitalization is $81.95M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Telecommunications Equipment] industry ranges from $202.5B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Telecommunications Equipment] industry is $4.98B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

NOKBF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileONDS’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • NOKBF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • ONDS’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, NOKBF is a better buy in the long-term than ONDS.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

ONDS’s TA Score shows that 6 TA indicator(s) are bullish.

  • ONDS’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 5 bearish.

Price Growth

NOKBF (@Telecommunications Equipment) experienced а +0.70% price change this week, while ONDS (@Telecommunications Equipment) price change was +92.66% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Telecommunications Equipment industry was -3.49%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +6.11%, and the average quarterly price growth was +44.64%.

Reported Earning Dates

ONDS is expected to report earnings on Mar 10, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Telecommunications Equipment (-3.49% weekly)

The Telecommunications Equipment industry produces voice and data communications equipment, which includes fiber optic delivery products, digital signal processors, high-speed voice, data and video delivery. Additionally, satellite systems, global positioning systems, wireless data systems, personal communications equipment, telephone handsets and payload equipment for satellites also fall into this category. Apple Inc., QUALCOMM Incorporated and Nokia are major global players in this segment.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NOKBF($21.9B) has a higher market cap than ONDS($82M). NOKBF YTD gains are higher at: 29.023 vs. ONDS (9.150). NOKBF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 3.51B vs. ONDS (-56.36M). NOKBF has more cash in the bank: 7.48B vs. ONDS (21M). ONDS has less debt than NOKBF: ONDS (33.4M) vs NOKBF (5.2B). NOKBF has higher revenues than ONDS: NOKBF (25.3B) vs ONDS (11.2M).
NOKBFONDSNOKBF / ONDS
Capitalization21.9B82M26,707%
EBITDA3.51B-56.36M-6,228%
Gain YTD29.0239.150317%
P/E Ratio4.85N/A-
Revenue25.3B11.2M225,893%
Total Cash7.48B21M35,614%
Total Debt5.2B33.4M15,578%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
NOKBF vs ONDS: Fundamental Ratings
NOKBF
ONDS
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
2026
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
8
Undervalued
71
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
76100
SMR RATING
1..100
4798
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4734
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
61100
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
50n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

NOKBF's Valuation (8) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for ONDS (71). This means that NOKBF’s stock grew somewhat faster than ONDS’s over the last 12 months.

NOKBF's Profit vs Risk Rating (76) in the null industry is in the same range as ONDS (100). This means that NOKBF’s stock grew similarly to ONDS’s over the last 12 months.

NOKBF's SMR Rating (47) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for ONDS (98). This means that NOKBF’s stock grew somewhat faster than ONDS’s over the last 12 months.

ONDS's Price Growth Rating (34) in the null industry is in the same range as NOKBF (47). This means that ONDS’s stock grew similarly to NOKBF’s over the last 12 months.

NOKBF's P/E Growth Rating (61) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for ONDS (100). This means that NOKBF’s stock grew somewhat faster than ONDS’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
ONDS
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
83%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
82%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
79%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
79%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
84%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 14 days ago
90%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
89%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
ONDS
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
GME31.261.82
+6.18%
GameStop Corp
TSLA479.8616.84
+3.64%
Tesla
AAPL253.482.44
+0.97%
Apple
BTC.X106140.600000110.890625
+0.10%
Bitcoin cryptocurrency
SPY604.29-2.50
-0.41%
SPDR® S&P 500® ETF Trust

NOKBF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that NOKBF and NOK have been poorly correlated (+27% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that NOKBF and NOK's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To NOKBF
1D Price
Change %
NOKBF100%
-2.59%
NOK - NOKBF
27%
Poorly correlated
+0.22%
GILT - NOKBF
20%
Poorly correlated
-2.13%
ONDS - NOKBF
6%
Poorly correlated
+0.60%
NVRVF - NOKBF
6%
Poorly correlated
N/A
QTRHF - NOKBF
4%
Poorly correlated
-0.69%
More

ONDS and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that ONDS and KN have been poorly correlated (+25% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that ONDS and KN's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To ONDS
1D Price
Change %
ONDS100%
+0.60%
KN - ONDS
25%
Poorly correlated
-2.42%
DGII - ONDS
24%
Poorly correlated
-1.78%
BDC - ONDS
24%
Poorly correlated
-3.77%
FEIM - ONDS
23%
Poorly correlated
N/A
AKTS - ONDS
23%
Poorly correlated
-9.05%
More