Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
NOICX vs TRIGX
NOICX vs TRIGX Comparison
Open Charts NOICX vs TRIGX
Natixis Oakmark International C
Price$16.18
Change-$0.21 (-1.28%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets293.23M
T. Rowe Price International Value Eq
Price$21.54
Change+$0.03 (+0.14%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets15.75B
NOICX vs TRIGX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
NOICX vs. TRIGX commentary
Jul 08, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NOICX is a Hold and TRIGX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
TRIGX has more cash in the bank: 15.8B vs. NOICX (293M). TRIGX pays higher dividends than NOICX: TRIGX (2.04) vs NOICX (1.52). NOICX was incepted earlier than TRIGX: NOICX (15 years) vs TRIGX (27 years). NOICX (2.13) is less costly to investors than TRIGX (0.87). NOICX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 35.00 vs. TRIGX (15.90). NOICX (2500) and TRIGX (2500) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. TRIGX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 25.12 vs. NOICX (19.57). TRIGX return over 5 years is better than : 99.95 vs. NOICX (62.95).
| NOICX | TRIGX | NOICX / TRIGX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.90 | 0.87 | 218% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.13 | 0.87 | 245% |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 27 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 23.140 | 26.780 | 86% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 2500 | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 293M | 15.8B | 2% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.52 | 2.04 | 75% |
| Returns for 1 year | 19.57 | 25.12 | 78% |
| Returns for 3 years | 40.27 | 72.07 | 56% |
| Returns for 5 years | 62.95 | 99.95 | 63% |
| Returns for 10 years | 38.46 | 78.90 | 49% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement