Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
NOIAX vs TRIGX
NOIAX vs TRIGX Comparison
Open Charts NOIAX vs TRIGX
Natixis Oakmark International A
Price$16.46
Change-$0.21 (-1.26%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets293.23M
T. Rowe Price International Value Eq
Price$21.31
Change-$0.23 (-1.07%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets15.75B
NOIAX vs TRIGX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
NOIAX vs. TRIGX commentary
Jul 08, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NOIAX is a Hold and TRIGX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
TRIGX has more cash in the bank: 15.8B vs. NOIAX (293M). NOIAX pays higher dividends than TRIGX: NOIAX (2.33) vs TRIGX (2.04). NOIAX was incepted earlier than TRIGX: NOIAX (15 years) vs TRIGX (27 years). NOIAX (1.38) is less costly to investors than TRIGX (0.87). NOIAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 35.00 vs. TRIGX (15.90). NOIAX (2500) and TRIGX (2500) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. TRIGX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 25.12 vs. NOIAX (20.46). TRIGX return over 5 years is better than : 99.95 vs. NOIAX (67.20).
| NOIAX | TRIGX | NOIAX / TRIGX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.15 | 0.87 | 132% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.38 | 0.87 | 159% |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 27 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 23.573 | 26.780 | 88% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 2500 | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 293M | 15.8B | 2% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.33 | 2.04 | 114% |
| Returns for 1 year | 20.46 | 25.12 | 81% |
| Returns for 3 years | 42.12 | 72.07 | 58% |
| Returns for 5 years | 67.20 | 99.95 | 67% |
| Returns for 10 years | 44.26 | 78.90 | 56% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement