Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
NOBL vs SCHD
NOBL vs SCHD Comparison
Open Charts NOBL vs SCHD
ProShares S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats
Price$103.17
Change-$0.21 (-0.20%)
Volume$150
Net Assets11.42B
Schwab US Dividend Equity ETF™
Price$26.79
Change-$0.09 (-0.33%)
Volume$17.46M
Net Assets69.97B
NOBL vs SCHD Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
Show more...
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
NOBL vs. SCHD commentary
Aug 12, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NOBL is a StrongBuy and SCHD is a StrongBuy.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SCHD has more net assets: 70B vs. NOBL (11.4B). NOBL has a higher annual dividend yield than SCHD: NOBL (4.901) vs SCHD (-0.083). NOBL was incepted earlier than SCHD: NOBL (12 years) vs SCHD (14 years). SCHD (0.06) has a lower expense ratio than NOBL (0.35). SCHD has a higher turnover NOBL (21.00) vs NOBL (21.00).
| NOBL | SCHD | NOBL / SCHD | |
| Gain YTD | 4.901 | -0.083 | -5,875% |
| Net Assets | 11.4B | 70B | 16% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.35 | 0.06 | 583% |
| Turnover | 21.00 | 29.00 | 72% |
| Yield | 2.09 | 3.87 | 54% |
| Fund Existence | 12 years | 14 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| NOBL | SCHD | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 90% | 4 days ago 80% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 88% | 4 days ago 90% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 75% | 4 days ago 71% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 65% | 4 days ago 83% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 82% | 4 days ago 86% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 80% | 4 days ago 79% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 80% | 4 days ago 84% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 11 days ago 77% | 11 days ago 71% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 83% | 4 days ago 90% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 73% | 4 days ago 75% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Show more...
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| GRNB | 24.27 | 0.02 | +0.08% |
| VanEck Green Bond ETF | |||
| GJR | 24.81 | N/A | N/A |
| Synthetic Fixed Income Securities | |||
| TCHI | 21.19 | -0.01 | -0.02% |
| iShares MSCI China Multisector Tech ETF | |||
| DIHP | 29.31 | -0.11 | -0.37% |
| Dimensional International High Pbly ETF | |||
| PALL | 104.71 | -0.95 | -0.90% |
| abrdn Physical Palladium Shares ETF | |||
NOBL and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, NOBL has been closely correlated with AFL. These tickers have moved in lockstep 69% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if NOBL jumps, then AFL could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To NOBL | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| NOBL | 100% | +0.34% | ||
| AFL - NOBL | 69% Closely correlated | +1.21% | ||
| ROP - NOBL | 62% Loosely correlated | -0.43% | ||
| NDSN - NOBL | 61% Loosely correlated | -0.48% | ||
| CINF - NOBL | 61% Loosely correlated | -0.88% | ||
| ECL - NOBL | 61% Loosely correlated | +1.16% | ||
More | ||||
SCHD and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SCHD has been closely correlated with TROW. These tickers have moved in lockstep 76% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if SCHD jumps, then TROW could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To SCHD | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| SCHD | 100% | -0.33% | ||
| TROW - SCHD | 76% Closely correlated | +0.20% | ||
| FITB - SCHD | 76% Closely correlated | -0.89% | ||
| USB - SCHD | 76% Closely correlated | -0.67% | ||
| APAM - SCHD | 75% Closely correlated | +1.24% | ||
| RF - SCHD | 74% Closely correlated | -1.16% | ||
More | ||||