NOA
Price
$14.38
Change
-$0.05 (-0.35%)
Updated
Oct 17 closing price
Capitalization
418.38M
25 days until earnings call
WFRD
Price
$62.29
Change
-$0.76 (-1.21%)
Updated
Oct 17 closing price
Capitalization
4.47B
2 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

NOA vs WFRD

Header iconNOA vs WFRD Comparison
Open Charts NOA vs WFRDBanner chart's image
North American Construction Group
Price$14.38
Change-$0.05 (-0.35%)
Volume$85.2K
Capitalization418.38M
Weatherford International
Price$62.29
Change-$0.76 (-1.21%)
Volume$1.16M
Capitalization4.47B
NOA vs WFRD Comparison Chart in %
NOA
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
WFRD
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
NOA vs. WFRD commentary
Oct 19, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NOA is a Hold and WFRD is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Oct 19, 2025
Stock price -- (NOA: $14.38 vs. WFRD: $62.29)
Brand notoriety: NOA and WFRD are both not notable
Both companies represent the Oilfield Services/Equipment industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: NOA: 57% vs. WFRD: 141%
Market capitalization -- NOA: $418.38M vs. WFRD: $4.47B
NOA [@Oilfield Services/Equipment] is valued at $418.38M. WFRD’s [@Oilfield Services/Equipment] market capitalization is $4.47B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Oilfield Services/Equipment] industry ranges from $48.75B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Oilfield Services/Equipment] industry is $3.01B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

NOA’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileWFRD’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • NOA’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • WFRD’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, both NOA and WFRD are a good buy in the long-term.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

NOA’s TA Score shows that 7 TA indicator(s) are bullish while WFRD’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • NOA’s TA Score: 7 bullish, 3 bearish.
  • WFRD’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, NOA is a better buy in the short-term than WFRD.

Price Growth

NOA (@Oilfield Services/Equipment) experienced а +6.91% price change this week, while WFRD (@Oilfield Services/Equipment) price change was +1.37% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Oilfield Services/Equipment industry was +1.05%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -1.57%, and the average quarterly price growth was +25.38%.

Reported Earning Dates

NOA is expected to report earnings on Nov 12, 2025.

WFRD is expected to report earnings on Oct 21, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Oilfield Services/Equipment (+1.05% weekly)

The oilfield services/equipment industry is involved in providing various equipment and services to oil and natural gas producers. These companies rent drilling rigs and/or provide services to build and maintain oil and gas wells. The performance of this industry is dependent on demand for oil and natural gas, which in turn is often driven by macroeconomic conditions or business cycles. Schlumberger NV, Halliburton Company, and Baker Hughes are some of the biggest oilfield services companies.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
WFRD($4.48B) has a higher market cap than NOA($418M). NOA has higher P/E ratio than WFRD: NOA (16.97) vs WFRD (9.60). WFRD YTD gains are higher at: -11.842 vs. NOA (-33.457). WFRD has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 1.08B vs. NOA (296M). WFRD has more cash in the bank: 943M vs. NOA (79M). NOA has less debt than WFRD: NOA (884M) vs WFRD (1.75B). WFRD has higher revenues than NOA: WFRD (5.15B) vs NOA (1.25B).
NOAWFRDNOA / WFRD
Capitalization418M4.48B9%
EBITDA296M1.08B27%
Gain YTD-33.457-11.842283%
P/E Ratio16.979.60177%
Revenue1.25B5.15B24%
Total Cash79M943M8%
Total Debt884M1.75B51%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
NOA vs WFRD: Fundamental Ratings
NOA
WFRD
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
6566
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
38
Fair valued
64
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
6258
SMR RATING
1..100
7727
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
6050
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
2885
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
8550

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

NOA's Valuation (38) in the Oilfield Services Or Equipment industry is in the same range as WFRD (64) in the null industry. This means that NOA’s stock grew similarly to WFRD’s over the last 12 months.

WFRD's Profit vs Risk Rating (58) in the null industry is in the same range as NOA (62) in the Oilfield Services Or Equipment industry. This means that WFRD’s stock grew similarly to NOA’s over the last 12 months.

WFRD's SMR Rating (27) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for NOA (77) in the Oilfield Services Or Equipment industry. This means that WFRD’s stock grew somewhat faster than NOA’s over the last 12 months.

WFRD's Price Growth Rating (50) in the null industry is in the same range as NOA (60) in the Oilfield Services Or Equipment industry. This means that WFRD’s stock grew similarly to NOA’s over the last 12 months.

NOA's P/E Growth Rating (28) in the Oilfield Services Or Equipment industry is somewhat better than the same rating for WFRD (85) in the null industry. This means that NOA’s stock grew somewhat faster than WFRD’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
NOAWFRD
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
74%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
76%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
66%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
86%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
60%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
75%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
67%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
76%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
69%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
84%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
67%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
72%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
67%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
83%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
65%
Bearish Trend 9 days ago
72%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
65%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
83%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
69%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
90%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
NOA
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
WFRD
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
EVSRX27.720.13
+0.47%
Allspring Disciplined US Core R6
GASFX29.620.09
+0.30%
Hennessy Gas Utility Investor
RPBAX29.380.04
+0.14%
T. Rowe Price Balanced
FWOEX18.30N/A
N/A
Fidelity Advisor Women's Leadership M
MSVEX6.20N/A
N/A
Morgan Stanley Vitality Portfolio A

NOA and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, NOA has been loosely correlated with EFXT. These tickers have moved in lockstep 48% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if NOA jumps, then EFXT could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To NOA
1D Price
Change %
NOA100%
-0.35%
EFXT - NOA
48%
Loosely correlated
+0.37%
WFRD - NOA
46%
Loosely correlated
-1.21%
VAL - NOA
45%
Loosely correlated
+0.37%
HLX - NOA
44%
Loosely correlated
+0.96%
TS - NOA
44%
Loosely correlated
+0.12%
More

WFRD and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, WFRD has been closely correlated with SLB. These tickers have moved in lockstep 80% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if WFRD jumps, then SLB could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To WFRD
1D Price
Change %
WFRD100%
-1.21%
SLB - WFRD
80%
Closely correlated
-0.88%
HAL - WFRD
80%
Closely correlated
+2.06%
OII - WFRD
79%
Closely correlated
+2.48%
RES - WFRD
76%
Closely correlated
+0.23%
WHD - WFRD
74%
Closely correlated
+2.81%
More