NOA
Price
$13.34
Change
-$1.10 (-7.62%)
Updated
Nov 13 closing price
Capitalization
389.29M
96 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
SLB
Price
$36.31
Change
+$0.24 (+0.67%)
Updated
Nov 13 closing price
Capitalization
54.24B
63 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

NOA vs SLB

Header iconNOA vs SLB Comparison
Open Charts NOA vs SLBBanner chart's image
North American Construction Group
Price$13.34
Change-$1.10 (-7.62%)
Volume$147.38K
Capitalization389.29M
SLB
Price$36.31
Change+$0.24 (+0.67%)
Volume$10.2M
Capitalization54.24B
NOA vs SLB Comparison Chart in %
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
NOA vs. SLB commentary
Nov 14, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NOA is a Buy and SLB is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Nov 14, 2025
Stock price -- (NOA: $13.34 vs. SLB: $36.31)
Brand notoriety: NOA: Not notable vs. SLB: Notable
Both companies represent the Oilfield Services/Equipment industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: NOA: 143% vs. SLB: 60%
Market capitalization -- NOA: $389.29M vs. SLB: $54.24B
NOA [@Oilfield Services/Equipment] is valued at $389.29M. SLB’s [@Oilfield Services/Equipment] market capitalization is $54.24B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Oilfield Services/Equipment] industry ranges from $54.24B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Oilfield Services/Equipment] industry is $3.31B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

NOA’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileSLB’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • NOA’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • SLB’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, SLB is a better buy in the long-term than NOA.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

NOA’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while SLB’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • NOA’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • SLB’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, SLB is a better buy in the short-term than NOA.

Price Growth

NOA (@Oilfield Services/Equipment) experienced а -4.71% price change this week, while SLB (@Oilfield Services/Equipment) price change was -0.14% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Oilfield Services/Equipment industry was -0.95%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +5.03%, and the average quarterly price growth was +19.33%.

Reported Earning Dates

NOA is expected to report earnings on Feb 18, 2026.

SLB is expected to report earnings on Jan 16, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Oilfield Services/Equipment (-0.95% weekly)

The oilfield services/equipment industry is involved in providing various equipment and services to oil and natural gas producers. These companies rent drilling rigs and/or provide services to build and maintain oil and gas wells. The performance of this industry is dependent on demand for oil and natural gas, which in turn is often driven by macroeconomic conditions or business cycles. Schlumberger NV, Halliburton Company, and Baker Hughes are some of the biggest oilfield services companies.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SLB($54.2B) has a higher market cap than NOA($389M). NOA (14.72) and SLB (14.13) have similar P/E ratio . SLB YTD gains are higher at: -3.703 vs. NOA (-33.179). SLB has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 7.73B vs. NOA (296M). SLB has more cash in the bank: 3.75B vs. NOA (79M). NOA has less debt than SLB: NOA (884M) vs SLB (13.7B). SLB has higher revenues than NOA: SLB (35.5B) vs NOA (1.25B).
NOASLBNOA / SLB
Capitalization389M54.2B1%
EBITDA296M7.73B4%
Gain YTD-33.179-3.703896%
P/E Ratio14.7214.13104%
Revenue1.25B35.5B4%
Total Cash79M3.75B2%
Total Debt884M13.7B6%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
NOA vs SLB: Fundamental Ratings
NOA
SLB
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
6817
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
46
Fair valued
94
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
6151
SMR RATING
1..100
7645
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
6346
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
2743
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5050

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

NOA's Valuation (46) in the Oilfield Services Or Equipment industry is somewhat better than the same rating for SLB (94). This means that NOA’s stock grew somewhat faster than SLB’s over the last 12 months.

SLB's Profit vs Risk Rating (51) in the Oilfield Services Or Equipment industry is in the same range as NOA (61). This means that SLB’s stock grew similarly to NOA’s over the last 12 months.

SLB's SMR Rating (45) in the Oilfield Services Or Equipment industry is in the same range as NOA (76). This means that SLB’s stock grew similarly to NOA’s over the last 12 months.

SLB's Price Growth Rating (46) in the Oilfield Services Or Equipment industry is in the same range as NOA (63). This means that SLB’s stock grew similarly to NOA’s over the last 12 months.

NOA's P/E Growth Rating (27) in the Oilfield Services Or Equipment industry is in the same range as SLB (43). This means that NOA’s stock grew similarly to SLB’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
NOASLB
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
75%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
79%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
81%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
77%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
64%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
78%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
61%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
64%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
69%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
69%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
68%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
64%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
67%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
67%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
65%
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
68%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
68%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
56%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
NOA
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
SLB
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
TLTD90.910.61
+0.68%
FlexShares Mstar DevMks exUS FctTilt ETF
JPSV57.810.18
+0.31%
JPMorgan Active Small Cap Value ETF
EWT65.410.02
+0.03%
iShares MSCI Taiwan ETF
JXX27.90-0.21
-0.75%
Janus Henderson Transformational Gr ETF
PSCH43.11-0.34
-0.77%
Invesco S&P SmallCap Health Care ETF

NOA and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, NOA has been loosely correlated with WFRD. These tickers have moved in lockstep 48% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if NOA jumps, then WFRD could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To NOA
1D Price
Change %
NOA100%
+1.91%
WFRD - NOA
48%
Loosely correlated
-4.83%
EFXT - NOA
47%
Loosely correlated
-0.66%
HLX - NOA
47%
Loosely correlated
-4.04%
SLB - NOA
46%
Loosely correlated
-4.09%
VAL - NOA
46%
Loosely correlated
-3.13%
More

SLB and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SLB has been closely correlated with HAL. These tickers have moved in lockstep 84% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if SLB jumps, then HAL could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To SLB
1D Price
Change %
SLB100%
-4.09%
HAL - SLB
84%
Closely correlated
-4.03%
WFRD - SLB
80%
Closely correlated
-4.83%
NOV - SLB
79%
Closely correlated
-1.85%
RES - SLB
75%
Closely correlated
-3.17%
OII - SLB
74%
Closely correlated
-1.14%
More