NNUP
Price
$1.62
Change
+$0.09 (+5.88%)
Updated
Feb 3 closing price
Capitalization
17.52M
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
OCLDF
Price
$13.87
Change
+$1.62 (+13.22%)
Updated
Sep 10 closing price
Capitalization
8.37B
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

NNUP vs OCLDF

Header iconNNUP vs OCLDF Comparison
Open Charts NNUP vs OCLDFBanner chart's image
Nocopi Technologies
Price$1.62
Change+$0.09 (+5.88%)
Volume$2.68K
Capitalization17.52M
Orica
Price$13.87
Change+$1.62 (+13.22%)
Volume$200
Capitalization8.37B
NNUP vs OCLDF Comparison Chart in %
NNUP
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
NNUP vs. OCLDF commentary
Feb 04, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NNUP is a Hold and OCLDF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Feb 04, 2026
Stock price -- (NNUP: $1.62 vs. OCLDF: $14.92)
Brand notoriety: NNUP and OCLDF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Chemicals: Specialty industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: NNUP: 77% vs. OCLDF: 100%
Market capitalization -- NNUP: $17.52M vs. OCLDF: $8.37B
NNUP [@Chemicals: Specialty] is valued at $17.52M. OCLDF’s [@Chemicals: Specialty] market capitalization is $8.37B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Chemicals: Specialty] industry ranges from $216.46B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Chemicals: Specialty] industry is $8.97B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

NNUP’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileOCLDF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • NNUP’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • OCLDF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, OCLDF is a better buy in the long-term than NNUP.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

NNUP’s TA Score shows that 2 TA indicator(s) are bullish.

  • NNUP’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 7 bearish.

Price Growth

NNUP (@Chemicals: Specialty) experienced а -8.99% price change this week, while OCLDF (@Chemicals: Specialty) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Chemicals: Specialty industry was +1.57%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +4.59%, and the average quarterly price growth was +18.03%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Chemicals: Specialty (+1.57% weekly)

The specialty chemicals sector includes companies that produce chemicals and industrial gases, which are of relatively high-value, often made to customer specifications. Examples of specialty chemicals are electronic chemicals, industrial gases, coatings, adhesives and sealants, industrial and institutional cleaning chemicals. The products are often valued on the basis of their purposes/performances rather than for their composition. Linde Plc, Ecolab Inc., Air Products and Chemicals, Inc., and Dow, Inc. are some of the largest companies making specialty chemicals.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
OCLDF($8.37B) has a higher market cap than NNUP($17.5M). NNUP YTD gains are higher at: 7.784 vs. OCLDF (0.000). OCLDF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 1.12B vs. NNUP (-344.7K). OCLDF has more cash in the bank: 747M vs. NNUP (11.5M). NNUP has less debt than OCLDF: NNUP (187K) vs OCLDF (3.01B). OCLDF has higher revenues than NNUP: OCLDF (8.15B) vs NNUP (1.82M).
NNUPOCLDFNNUP / OCLDF
Capitalization17.5M8.37B0%
EBITDA-344.7K1.12B-0%
Gain YTD7.7840.000-
P/E RatioN/A64.62-
Revenue1.82M8.15B0%
Total Cash11.5M747M2%
Total Debt187K3.01B0%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
NNUP vs OCLDF: Fundamental Ratings
NNUP
OCLDF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
9145
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
94
Overvalued
40
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
9540
SMR RATING
1..100
9295
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4648
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
24
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5050

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

OCLDF's Valuation (40) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for NNUP (94). This means that OCLDF’s stock grew somewhat faster than NNUP’s over the last 12 months.

OCLDF's Profit vs Risk Rating (40) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for NNUP (95). This means that OCLDF’s stock grew somewhat faster than NNUP’s over the last 12 months.

NNUP's SMR Rating (92) in the null industry is in the same range as OCLDF (95). This means that NNUP’s stock grew similarly to OCLDF’s over the last 12 months.

NNUP's Price Growth Rating (46) in the null industry is in the same range as OCLDF (48). This means that NNUP’s stock grew similarly to OCLDF’s over the last 12 months.

NNUP's P/E Growth Rating (2) in the null industry is in the same range as OCLDF (4). This means that NNUP’s stock grew similarly to OCLDF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
NNUPOCLDF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
79%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
67%
N/A
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
68%
N/A
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
63%
N/A
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
70%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
25%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
68%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
29%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 15 days ago
77%
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
65%
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
76%
N/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
NNUP
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
BLFY13.770.36
+2.68%
Blue Foundry Bancorp
LTRN3.06N/A
N/A
Lantern Pharma
EXPI8.47-0.44
-4.94%
eXp World Holdings
ESTC60.02-5.46
-8.34%
Elastic NV
SHOP119.29-12.91
-9.77%
Shopify Inc

NNUP and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that NNUP and AVOA have been poorly correlated (+26% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that NNUP and AVOA's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To NNUP
1D Price
Change %
NNUP100%
-6.79%
AVOA - NNUP
26%
Poorly correlated
N/A
TKCBF - NNUP
24%
Poorly correlated
N/A
HDSN - NNUP
21%
Poorly correlated
+2.17%
NVZMF - NNUP
11%
Poorly correlated
-2.04%
OCLDF - NNUP
9%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

OCLDF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that OCLDF and NVZMY have been poorly correlated (+9% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that OCLDF and NVZMY's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To OCLDF
1D Price
Change %
OCLDF100%
N/A
NVZMY - OCLDF
9%
Poorly correlated
-0.78%
NNUP - OCLDF
9%
Poorly correlated
-6.79%
NOPMF - OCLDF
7%
Poorly correlated
+5.61%
NVZMF - OCLDF
0%
Poorly correlated
-2.04%
NPCPF - OCLDF
0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More