NNOMF
Price
$0.74
Change
-$0.03 (-3.90%)
Updated
Sep 5 closing price
Capitalization
83.12M
NPCPF
Price
$8.12
Change
+$0.49 (+6.42%)
Updated
Jul 9 closing price
Capitalization
16.54B
Interact to see
Advertisement

NNOMF vs NPCPF

Header iconNNOMF vs NPCPF Comparison
Open Charts NNOMF vs NPCPFBanner chart's image
Nano One Materials
Price$0.74
Change-$0.03 (-3.90%)
Volume$85.25K
Capitalization83.12M
Nippon Paint Holdings
Price$8.12
Change+$0.49 (+6.42%)
Volume$1.6K
Capitalization16.54B
NNOMF vs NPCPF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
NNOMF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
NPCPF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
NNOMF vs. NPCPF commentary
Sep 08, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NNOMF is a Hold and NPCPF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 08, 2025
Stock price -- (NNOMF: $0.74 vs. NPCPF: $8.12)
Brand notoriety: NNOMF and NPCPF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Chemicals: Specialty industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: NNOMF: 148% vs. NPCPF: 106%
Market capitalization -- NNOMF: $83.12M vs. NPCPF: $16.54B
NNOMF [@Chemicals: Specialty] is valued at $83.12M. NPCPF’s [@Chemicals: Specialty] market capitalization is $16.54B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Chemicals: Specialty] industry ranges from $220.16B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Chemicals: Specialty] industry is $9.05B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

NNOMF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileNPCPF’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • NNOMF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • NPCPF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, NPCPF is a better buy in the long-term than NNOMF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

NNOMF’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while NPCPF’s TA Score has 1 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • NNOMF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • NPCPF’s TA Score: 1 bullish, 0 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, NPCPF is a better buy in the short-term than NNOMF.

Price Growth

NNOMF (@Chemicals: Specialty) experienced а -8.46% price change this week, while NPCPF (@Chemicals: Specialty) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Chemicals: Specialty industry was -1.10%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +4.08%, and the average quarterly price growth was +11.60%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Chemicals: Specialty (-1.10% weekly)

The specialty chemicals sector includes companies that produce chemicals and industrial gases, which are of relatively high-value, often made to customer specifications. Examples of specialty chemicals are electronic chemicals, industrial gases, coatings, adhesives and sealants, industrial and institutional cleaning chemicals. The products are often valued on the basis of their purposes/performances rather than for their composition. Linde Plc, Ecolab Inc., Air Products and Chemicals, Inc., and Dow, Inc. are some of the largest companies making specialty chemicals.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NPCPF($16.5B) has a higher market cap than NNOMF($83.1M). NNOMF YTD gains are higher at: 32.533 vs. NPCPF (29.442). NPCPF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 297B vs. NNOMF (-8.11M). NPCPF has more cash in the bank: 455B vs. NNOMF (23M). NNOMF has less debt than NPCPF: NNOMF (17.9M) vs NPCPF (1.42T). NPCPF has higher revenues than NNOMF: NPCPF (1.67T) vs NNOMF (0).
NNOMFNPCPFNNOMF / NPCPF
Capitalization83.1M16.5B1%
EBITDA-8.11M297B-0%
Gain YTD32.53329.442111%
P/E RatioN/A18.85-
Revenue01.67T-
Total Cash23M455B0%
Total Debt17.9M1.42T0%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
NNOMF vs NPCPF: Fundamental Ratings
NNOMF
NPCPF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
71
Overvalued
70
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100100
SMR RATING
1..100
97100
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
3848
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
10037
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
50n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

NPCPF's Valuation (70) in the null industry is in the same range as NNOMF (71). This means that NPCPF’s stock grew similarly to NNOMF’s over the last 12 months.

NPCPF's Profit vs Risk Rating (100) in the null industry is in the same range as NNOMF (100). This means that NPCPF’s stock grew similarly to NNOMF’s over the last 12 months.

NNOMF's SMR Rating (97) in the null industry is in the same range as NPCPF (100). This means that NNOMF’s stock grew similarly to NPCPF’s over the last 12 months.

NNOMF's Price Growth Rating (38) in the null industry is in the same range as NPCPF (48). This means that NNOMF’s stock grew similarly to NPCPF’s over the last 12 months.

NPCPF's P/E Growth Rating (37) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for NNOMF (100). This means that NPCPF’s stock grew somewhat faster than NNOMF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
NNOMFNPCPF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
83%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
90%
N/A
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
71%
N/A
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
90%
N/A
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
88%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
20%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
71%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
20%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 11 days ago
74%
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
86%
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
84%
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
69%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
28%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
NNOMF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
NPCPF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
CNBN22.001.00
+4.76%
CNB Bank Shares, Inc.
KYCCF390.007.15
+1.87%
Keyence Corp.
GRKZF23.87N/A
N/A
Greek Organisation of Football Prognostics SA
RHCGF1.43N/A
N/A
Ryman Healthcare Ltd.
SFES0.79-0.04
-5.19%
Safeguard Scientifics, Inc.

NNOMF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, NNOMF has been loosely correlated with BIOA. These tickers have moved in lockstep 43% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if NNOMF jumps, then BIOA could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To NNOMF
1D Price
Change %
NNOMF100%
-3.11%
BIOA - NNOMF
43%
Loosely correlated
+1.06%
ECVT - NNOMF
28%
Poorly correlated
-0.11%
SXYAY - NNOMF
26%
Poorly correlated
+1.36%
BNTGY - NNOMF
24%
Poorly correlated
+1.00%
BASFY - NNOMF
23%
Poorly correlated
-0.16%
More

NPCPF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, NPCPF has been loosely correlated with TYOBY. These tickers have moved in lockstep 39% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if NPCPF jumps, then TYOBY could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To NPCPF
1D Price
Change %
NPCPF100%
N/A
TYOBY - NPCPF
39%
Loosely correlated
N/A
TOSCF - NPCPF
23%
Poorly correlated
+2.19%
NTIC - NPCPF
22%
Poorly correlated
+0.72%
NMGX - NPCPF
12%
Poorly correlated
N/A
NNOMF - NPCPF
5%
Poorly correlated
-3.11%
More