NNDM
Price
$1.36
Change
-$0.01 (-0.72%)
Updated
Aug 20, 01:55 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
299.85M
Earnings call today
QUBT
Price
$14.60
Change
-$0.26 (-1.75%)
Updated
Aug 20, 02:06 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
2.38B
89 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

NNDM vs QUBT

Header iconNNDM vs QUBT Comparison
Open Charts NNDM vs QUBTBanner chart's image
Nano Dimension
Price$1.36
Change-$0.01 (-0.72%)
Volume$200
Capitalization299.85M
Quantum Computing
Price$14.60
Change-$0.26 (-1.75%)
Volume$8.09K
Capitalization2.38B
NNDM vs QUBT Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
NNDM
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
QUBT
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
NNDM vs. QUBT commentary
Aug 20, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NNDM is a Hold and QUBT is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Aug 20, 2025
Stock price -- (NNDM: $1.38 vs. QUBT: $14.86)
Brand notoriety: NNDM and QUBT are both not notable
Both companies represent the Computer Processing Hardware industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: NNDM: 67% vs. QUBT: 58%
Market capitalization -- NNDM: $299.85M vs. QUBT: $2.38B
NNDM [@Computer Processing Hardware] is valued at $299.85M. QUBT’s [@Computer Processing Hardware] market capitalization is $2.38B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Computer Processing Hardware] industry ranges from $166.89B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Computer Processing Hardware] industry is $11.25B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

NNDM’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileQUBT’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • NNDM’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • QUBT’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, QUBT is a better buy in the long-term than NNDM.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

NNDM’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while QUBT’s TA Score has 1 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • NNDM’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 6 bearish.
  • QUBT’s TA Score: 1 bullish, 7 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, NNDM is a better buy in the short-term than QUBT.

Price Growth

NNDM (@Computer Processing Hardware) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while QUBT (@Computer Processing Hardware) price change was -10.48% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Computer Processing Hardware industry was -5.26%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -4.56%, and the average quarterly price growth was -5.71%.

Reported Earning Dates

NNDM is expected to report earnings on Aug 20, 2025.

QUBT is expected to report earnings on Nov 17, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Computer Processing Hardware (-5.26% weekly)

Computer Processing Hardware industry produces central processing unit, monitor, keyboard, computer data storage devices, and graphics card. Business activity and economic growth are potential drivers of this industry – if more businesses are growing or flourishing, so would their investments in computer equipment. Dell Technologies, Inc, Hewlett Packard Enterprise Co., NCR Corporation are key producers of computer processing hardware.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
QUBT($2.38B) has a higher market cap than NNDM($300M). QUBT YTD gains are higher at: -10.211 vs. NNDM (-44.355). NNDM has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): -28.86M vs. QUBT (-69.89M). NNDM has more cash in the bank: 761M vs. QUBT (349M). QUBT has less debt than NNDM: QUBT (1.54M) vs NNDM (11.9M). NNDM has higher revenues than QUBT: NNDM (57.7M) vs QUBT (263K).
NNDMQUBTNNDM / QUBT
Capitalization300M2.38B13%
EBITDA-28.86M-69.89M41%
Gain YTD-44.355-10.211434%
P/E RatioN/AN/A-
Revenue57.7M263K21,939%
Total Cash761M349M218%
Total Debt11.9M1.54M775%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
NNDM vs QUBT: Fundamental Ratings
NNDM
QUBT
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
677
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
33
Fair valued
96
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
10061
SMR RATING
1..100
9497
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
8734
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
100100
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
8550

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

NNDM's Valuation (33) in the Textiles industry is somewhat better than the same rating for QUBT (96) in the null industry. This means that NNDM’s stock grew somewhat faster than QUBT’s over the last 12 months.

QUBT's Profit vs Risk Rating (61) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for NNDM (100) in the Textiles industry. This means that QUBT’s stock grew somewhat faster than NNDM’s over the last 12 months.

NNDM's SMR Rating (94) in the Textiles industry is in the same range as QUBT (97) in the null industry. This means that NNDM’s stock grew similarly to QUBT’s over the last 12 months.

QUBT's Price Growth Rating (34) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for NNDM (87) in the Textiles industry. This means that QUBT’s stock grew somewhat faster than NNDM’s over the last 12 months.

QUBT's P/E Growth Rating (100) in the null industry is in the same range as NNDM (100) in the Textiles industry. This means that QUBT’s stock grew similarly to NNDM’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
NNDMQUBT
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
76%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
70%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
87%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
79%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
83%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
75%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
87%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
81%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
88%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 8 days ago
75%
Bullish Trend 10 days ago
89%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 13 days ago
86%
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
89%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
81%
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
80%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
NNDM
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
QUBT
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
FBPGX27.530.11
+0.40%
Cantor Fitzgerald Equity Dividend Plus A
MWOCX50.030.16
+0.32%
MFS Global Growth C
FLPSX45.18N/A
N/A
Fidelity Low-Priced Stock
GCECX18.44N/A
N/A
AB Global Core Equity C
WEMCX5.86-0.08
-1.35%
Allspring Emerging Growth C

NNDM and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, NNDM has been loosely correlated with CRSR. These tickers have moved in lockstep 36% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if NNDM jumps, then CRSR could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To NNDM
1D Price
Change %
NNDM100%
N/A
CRSR - NNDM
36%
Loosely correlated
-0.70%
SSYS - NNDM
31%
Poorly correlated
+13.84%
RGTI - NNDM
30%
Poorly correlated
-8.84%
DDD - NNDM
29%
Poorly correlated
-5.74%
QUBT - NNDM
27%
Poorly correlated
-6.51%
More

QUBT and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, QUBT has been closely correlated with QBTS. These tickers have moved in lockstep 70% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if QUBT jumps, then QBTS could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To QUBT
1D Price
Change %
QUBT100%
-6.51%
QBTS - QUBT
70%
Closely correlated
-7.49%
RGTI - QUBT
63%
Loosely correlated
-8.84%
IONQ - QUBT
54%
Loosely correlated
-8.53%
QMCO - QUBT
51%
Loosely correlated
-8.20%
UMAC - QUBT
35%
Loosely correlated
-2.99%
More