It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
NNDM’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileQUBT’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
NNDM’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while QUBT’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).
NNDM (@Computer Peripherals) experienced а +5.33% price change this week, while QUBT (@Computer Peripherals) price change was +120.34% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Computer Peripherals industry was +13.63%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +89.05%, and the average quarterly price growth was +226.76%.
NNDM is expected to report earnings on Mar 12, 2025.
QUBT is expected to report earnings on Mar 27, 2025.
Computer peripherals connect to a computer system to add functionality or to get information from or put information into computers. Think hard disk drive, data storage systems, cloud storage devices, printer and scanner, or mouse, keyboard etc. Some of the major companies operating in the computer peripherals industry include Western Digital Corporation, Seagate Technology PLC, NetApp, Inc., Zebra Technologies Corporation, and Xerox Holdings Corp.
NNDM | QUBT | NNDM / QUBT | |
Capitalization | 617M | 75.1M | 822% |
EBITDA | -48.58M | -35.07M | 139% |
Gain YTD | 7.083 | 1738.791 | 0% |
P/E Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
Revenue | 56.3M | 284K | 19,824% |
Total Cash | 852M | 7.38M | 11,546% |
Total Debt | 13.8M | 5.67M | 244% |
NNDM | QUBT | ||
---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 21 | 29 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 34 Fair valued | 99 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 100 | 39 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 92 | 97 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 53 | 34 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 100 | 100 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 41 | n/a |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
NNDM's Valuation (34) in the Textiles industry is somewhat better than the same rating for QUBT (99) in the null industry. This means that NNDM’s stock grew somewhat faster than QUBT’s over the last 12 months.
QUBT's Profit vs Risk Rating (39) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for NNDM (100) in the Textiles industry. This means that QUBT’s stock grew somewhat faster than NNDM’s over the last 12 months.
NNDM's SMR Rating (92) in the Textiles industry is in the same range as QUBT (97) in the null industry. This means that NNDM’s stock grew similarly to QUBT’s over the last 12 months.
QUBT's Price Growth Rating (34) in the null industry is in the same range as NNDM (53) in the Textiles industry. This means that QUBT’s stock grew similarly to NNDM’s over the last 12 months.
QUBT's P/E Growth Rating (100) in the null industry is in the same range as NNDM (100) in the Textiles industry. This means that QUBT’s stock grew similarly to NNDM’s over the last 12 months.
NNDM | QUBT | |
---|---|---|
RSI ODDS (%) | N/A | 2 days ago90% |
Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago79% | 2 days ago90% |
Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago78% | 2 days ago90% |
MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago73% | 2 days ago85% |
TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago77% | 2 days ago87% |
TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago75% | 2 days ago82% |
Advances ODDS (%) | 10 days ago79% | 2 days ago89% |
Declines ODDS (%) | 3 days ago87% | 7 days ago90% |
BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago86% | 2 days ago90% |
Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago86% | 2 days ago76% |
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, NNDM has been loosely correlated with SSYS. These tickers have moved in lockstep 38% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if NNDM jumps, then SSYS could also see price increases.
Ticker / NAME | Correlation To NNDM | 1D Price Change % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
NNDM | 100% | +16.29% | ||
SSYS - NNDM | 38% Loosely correlated | -2.44% | ||
CRSR - NNDM | 35% Loosely correlated | -1.19% | ||
RGTI - NNDM | 35% Loosely correlated | +32.03% | ||
DDD - NNDM | 32% Poorly correlated | -4.04% | ||
MKFG - NNDM | 30% Poorly correlated | -9.64% | ||
More |
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, QUBT has been loosely correlated with QBTS. These tickers have moved in lockstep 49% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if QUBT jumps, then QBTS could also see price increases.
Ticker / NAME | Correlation To QUBT | 1D Price Change % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
QUBT | 100% | +51.53% | ||
QBTS - QUBT | 49% Loosely correlated | +16.18% | ||
IONQ - QUBT | 42% Loosely correlated | +4.86% | ||
RGTI - QUBT | 41% Loosely correlated | +32.03% | ||
NNDM - QUBT | 29% Poorly correlated | +16.29% | ||
SSYS - QUBT | 27% Poorly correlated | -2.44% | ||
More |