Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
NMVZX vs VMVAX
NMVZX vs VMVAX Comparison
Open Charts NMVZX vs VMVAX
Nuance Mid Cap Value Z
Price$12.54
Change+$0.09 (+0.72%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets414.28M
Vanguard Mid-Cap Value Index Admiral
Price$91.65
Change+$0.65 (+0.71%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets31.8B
NMVZX vs VMVAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
NMVZX vs. VMVAX commentary
Dec 04, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NMVZX is a Buy and VMVAX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
VMVAX has more cash in the bank: 31.8B vs. NMVZX (414M). NMVZX pays higher dividends than VMVAX: NMVZX (2.64) vs VMVAX (2.14). NMVZX was incepted earlier than VMVAX: NMVZX (9 years) vs VMVAX (14 years). NMVZX (0.86) is less costly to investors than VMVAX (0.07). NMVZX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 74.00 vs. VMVAX (19.00). NMVZX has a lower initial minimum investment than VMVAX: NMVZX (2500) vs VMVAX (3000). VMVAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 1.74 vs. NMVZX (-5.45). VMVAX return over 5 years is better than : 49.66 vs. NMVZX (-3.14).
| NMVZX | VMVAX | NMVZX / VMVAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.81 | 0.07 | 1,157% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.86 | 0.07 | 1,229% |
| Fund Existence | 9 years | 14 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 3.911 | 9.493 | 41% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 3000 | 83% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 414M | 31.8B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.64 | 2.14 | 124% |
| Returns for 1 year | -5.45 | 1.74 | -312% |
| Returns for 3 years | -0.27 | 25.04 | -1% |
| Returns for 5 years | -3.14 | 49.66 | -6% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 102.93 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers