Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
NMULX vs VTSMX
NMULX vs VTSMX Comparison
Open Charts NMULX vs VTSMX
Neuberger Berman Multi-Cap Opp I
Price$11.09
Change+$0.10 (+0.91%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets248.78M
Vanguard Total Stock Mkt Idx I
Price$149.99
Change+$1.28 (+0.86%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.82T
NMULX vs VTSMX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
NMULX vs. VTSMX commentary
Jul 07, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NMULX is a Buy and VTSMX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
VTSMX has more cash in the bank: 1.82T vs. NMULX (249M). VTSMX pays higher dividends than NMULX: VTSMX (1.12) vs NMULX (0.12). NMULX was incepted earlier than VTSMX: NMULX (19 years) vs VTSMX (33 years). NMULX (0.88) is less costly to investors than VTSMX (0.14). NMULX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 25.00 vs. VTSMX (2.00). VTSMX has a lower initial minimum investment than NMULX: VTSMX (3000) vs NMULX (1000000). VTSMX (13.89) and NMULX (13.65) have marching annual gain over last year. VTSMX return over 5 years is better than : 95.59 vs. NMULX (-25.92).
| NMULX | VTSMX | NMULX / VTSMX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.88 | 0.14 | 629% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.88 | 0.14 | 629% |
| Fund Existence | 19 years | 33 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 7.984 | 6.421 | 124% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 3000 | 33,333% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 249M | 1.82T | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.12 | 1.12 | 11% |
| Returns for 1 year | 13.65 | 13.89 | 98% |
| Returns for 3 years | -0.42 | 62.08 | -1% |
| Returns for 5 years | -25.92 | 95.59 | -27% |
| Returns for 10 years | -28.70 | 198.05 | -14% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement