Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
NMULX vs VITSX
NMULX vs VITSX Comparison
Open Charts NMULX vs VITSX
Neuberger Berman Multi-Cap Opp I
Price$11.09
Change+$0.10 (+0.91%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets248.78M
Vanguard Total Stock Market Idx I
Price$150.04
Change+$1.28 (+0.86%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.82T
NMULX vs VITSX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
NMULX vs. VITSX commentary
Jul 07, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NMULX is a Buy and VITSX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
VITSX has more cash in the bank: 1.82T vs. NMULX (249M). VITSX pays higher dividends than NMULX: VITSX (1.22) vs NMULX (0.12). NMULX was incepted earlier than VITSX: NMULX (19 years) vs VITSX (28 years). NMULX (0.88) is less costly to investors than VITSX (0.03). NMULX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 25.00 vs. VITSX (2.00). NMULX has a lower initial minimum investment than VITSX: NMULX (1000000) vs VITSX (5000000). VITSX (13.90) and NMULX (13.65) have marching annual gain over last year. VITSX return over 5 years is better than : 95.64 vs. NMULX (-25.92).
| NMULX | VITSX | NMULX / VITSX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.88 | 0.03 | 2,933% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.88 | 0.03 | 2,933% |
| Fund Existence | 19 years | 28 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 7.984 | 6.423 | 124% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 5000000 | 20% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 249M | 1.82T | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.12 | 1.22 | 10% |
| Returns for 1 year | 13.65 | 13.90 | 98% |
| Returns for 3 years | -0.42 | 62.12 | -1% |
| Returns for 5 years | -25.92 | 95.64 | -27% |
| Returns for 10 years | -28.70 | 198.64 | -14% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement