Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
NMUCX vs VTSMX
NMUCX vs VTSMX Comparison
Open Charts NMUCX vs VTSMX
Neuberger Berman Multi-Cap Opp C
Price$10.52
Change+$0.02 (+0.19%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets247.62M
Vanguard Total Stock Mkt Idx I
Price$159.25
Change+$0.69 (+0.44%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets2.02T
NMUCX vs VTSMX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
NMUCX vs. VTSMX commentary
Oct 18, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NMUCX is a Buy and VTSMX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
VTSMX has more cash in the bank: 2.02T vs. NMUCX (248M). VTSMX pays higher dividends than NMUCX: VTSMX (1.04) vs NMUCX (0.00). NMUCX was incepted earlier than VTSMX: NMUCX (16 years) vs VTSMX (34 years). NMUCX (2.00) is less costly to investors than VTSMX (0.14). NMUCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 25.00 vs. VTSMX (2.00). NMUCX has a lower initial minimum investment than VTSMX: NMUCX (1000) vs VTSMX (3000). VTSMX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 13.79 vs. NMUCX (4.37). VTSMX return over 5 years is better than : 84.86 vs. NMUCX (-38.69).
| NMUCX | VTSMX | NMUCX / VTSMX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 2.00 | 0.14 | 1,429% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.00 | 0.14 | 1,429% |
| Fund Existence | 16 years | 34 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 10.388 | 13.012 | 80% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 3000 | 33% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 248M | 2.02T | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 1.04 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 4.37 | 13.79 | 32% |
| Returns for 3 years | -2.32 | 76.02 | -3% |
| Returns for 5 years | -38.69 | 84.86 | -46% |
| Returns for 10 years | -33.60 | 225.10 | -15% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement