Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
NMUCX vs VTSMX
NMUCX vs VTSMX Comparison
Open Charts NMUCX vs VTSMX
Neuberger Multi-Cap Opportunities C
Price$10.87
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets252.95M
Vanguard Total Stock Mkt Idx I
Price$165.31
Change-$0.09 (-0.05%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets2.06T
NMUCX vs VTSMX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
NMUCX vs. VTSMX commentary
Dec 28, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NMUCX is a Buy and VTSMX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
VTSMX has more cash in the bank: 2.06T vs. NMUCX (253M). VTSMX pays higher dividends than NMUCX: VTSMX (1.02) vs NMUCX (0.00). NMUCX was incepted earlier than VTSMX: NMUCX (16 years) vs VTSMX (34 years). NMUCX (2.00) is less costly to investors than VTSMX (0.14). NMUCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 36.00 vs. VTSMX (2.00). NMUCX has a lower initial minimum investment than VTSMX: NMUCX (1000) vs VTSMX (3000). VTSMX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 14.32 vs. NMUCX (11.83). VTSMX return over 5 years is better than : 76.71 vs. NMUCX (-27.48).
| NMUCX | VTSMX | NMUCX / VTSMX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 2.00 | 0.14 | 1,429% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.00 | 0.14 | 1,429% |
| Fund Existence | 16 years | 34 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 14.061 | 17.313 | 81% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 3000 | 33% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 253M | 2.06T | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 1.02 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 11.83 | 14.32 | 83% |
| Returns for 3 years | 24.37 | 78.67 | 31% |
| Returns for 5 years | -27.48 | 76.71 | -36% |
| Returns for 10 years | -30.42 | 232.18 | -13% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement