Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
NMUCX vs VTSMX
NMUCX vs VTSMX Comparison
Open Charts NMUCX vs VTSMX
Neuberger Berman Multi-Cap Opp C
Price$10.37
Change+$0.04 (+0.39%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets250.05M
Vanguard Total Stock Mkt Idx I
Price$152.62
Change+$0.67 (+0.44%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.91T
NMUCX vs VTSMX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
NMUCX vs. VTSMX commentary
Jul 27, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NMUCX is a Buy and VTSMX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
VTSMX has more cash in the bank: 1.91T vs. NMUCX (250M). VTSMX pays higher dividends than NMUCX: VTSMX (1.12) vs NMUCX (0.00). NMUCX was incepted earlier than VTSMX: NMUCX (16 years) vs VTSMX (33 years). NMUCX (2.00) is less costly to investors than VTSMX (0.14). NMUCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 25.00 vs. VTSMX (2.00). NMUCX has a lower initial minimum investment than VTSMX: NMUCX (1000) vs VTSMX (3000). VTSMX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 17.75 vs. NMUCX (13.33). VTSMX return over 5 years is better than : 93.51 vs. NMUCX (-34.28).
| NMUCX | VTSMX | NMUCX / VTSMX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 2.00 | 0.14 | 1,429% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.00 | 0.14 | 1,429% |
| Fund Existence | 16 years | 33 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 8.814 | 8.287 | 106% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 3000 | 33% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 250M | 1.91T | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 1.12 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 13.33 | 17.75 | 75% |
| Returns for 3 years | -7.41 | 60.60 | -12% |
| Returns for 5 years | -34.28 | 93.51 | -37% |
| Returns for 10 years | -36.46 | 200.97 | -18% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement