Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
NMUCX vs VTSMX
NMUCX vs VTSMX Comparison
Open Charts NMUCX vs VTSMX
Neuberger Berman Multi-Cap Opp C
Price$10.61
Change-$0.17 (-1.58%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets252.64M
Vanguard Total Stock Mkt Idx I
Price$160.55
Change-$2.87 (-1.76%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets2.05T
NMUCX vs VTSMX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
NMUCX vs. VTSMX commentary
Nov 14, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NMUCX is a Buy and VTSMX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
VTSMX has more cash in the bank: 2.05T vs. NMUCX (253M). VTSMX pays higher dividends than NMUCX: VTSMX (1.02) vs NMUCX (0.00). NMUCX was incepted earlier than VTSMX: NMUCX (16 years) vs VTSMX (34 years). NMUCX (2.00) is less costly to investors than VTSMX (0.14). NMUCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 25.00 vs. VTSMX (2.00). NMUCX has a lower initial minimum investment than VTSMX: NMUCX (1000) vs VTSMX (3000). VTSMX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 13.42 vs. NMUCX (5.69). VTSMX return over 5 years is better than : 83.98 vs. NMUCX (-39.40).
| NMUCX | VTSMX | NMUCX / VTSMX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 2.00 | 0.14 | 1,429% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.00 | 0.14 | 1,429% |
| Fund Existence | 16 years | 34 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 13.116 | 15.972 | 82% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 3000 | 33% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 253M | 2.05T | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 1.02 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 5.69 | 13.42 | 42% |
| Returns for 3 years | -7.47 | 68.22 | -11% |
| Returns for 5 years | -39.40 | 83.98 | -47% |
| Returns for 10 years | -32.10 | 235.40 | -14% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement