Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
NMUCX vs VTSMX
NMUCX vs VTSMX Comparison
Open Charts NMUCX vs VTSMX
Neuberger Berman Multi-Cap Opp C
Price$10.43
Change-$0.03 (-0.29%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets251.19M
Vanguard Total Stock Mkt Idx I
Price$154.00
Change-$0.41 (-0.27%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.91T
NMUCX vs VTSMX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
NMUCX vs. VTSMX commentary
Aug 19, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NMUCX is a Buy and VTSMX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
VTSMX has more cash in the bank: 1.91T vs. NMUCX (251M). VTSMX pays higher dividends than NMUCX: VTSMX (1.09) vs NMUCX (0.00). NMUCX was incepted earlier than VTSMX: NMUCX (16 years) vs VTSMX (33 years). NMUCX (2.00) is less costly to investors than VTSMX (0.14). NMUCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 25.00 vs. VTSMX (2.00). NMUCX has a lower initial minimum investment than VTSMX: NMUCX (1000) vs VTSMX (3000). VTSMX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 16.21 vs. NMUCX (11.43). VTSMX return over 5 years is better than : 85.82 vs. NMUCX (-36.29).
| NMUCX | VTSMX | NMUCX / VTSMX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 2.00 | 0.14 | 1,429% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.00 | 0.14 | 1,429% |
| Fund Existence | 16 years | 33 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 9.444 | 9.266 | 102% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 3000 | 33% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 251M | 1.91T | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 1.09 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 11.43 | 16.21 | 71% |
| Returns for 3 years | -15.27 | 46.80 | -33% |
| Returns for 5 years | -36.29 | 85.82 | -42% |
| Returns for 10 years | -37.03 | 202.54 | -18% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement