Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
NMUCX vs VTSAX
NMUCX vs VTSAX Comparison
Open Charts NMUCX vs VTSAX
Neuberger Multi-Cap Opportunities C
Price$10.82
Change+$0.23 (+2.17%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets254.57M
Vanguard Total Stock Mkt Idx Adm
Price$165.45
Change+$4.47 (+2.78%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets2.06T
NMUCX vs VTSAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
NMUCX vs. VTSAX commentary
Feb 04, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NMUCX is a Buy and VTSAX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
VTSAX has more cash in the bank: 2.06T vs. NMUCX (255M). VTSAX pays higher dividends than NMUCX: VTSAX (1.09) vs NMUCX (0.00). NMUCX was incepted earlier than VTSAX: NMUCX (16 years) vs VTSAX (25 years). NMUCX (2.00) is less costly to investors than VTSAX (0.04). NMUCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 36.00 vs. VTSAX (2.00). NMUCX has a lower initial minimum investment than VTSAX: NMUCX (1000) vs VTSAX (3000). VTSAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 14.80 vs. NMUCX (10.63). VTSAX return over 5 years is better than : 68.23 vs. NMUCX (-30.55).
| NMUCX | VTSAX | NMUCX / VTSAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 2.00 | 0.04 | 5,000% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.00 | 0.04 | 5,000% |
| Fund Existence | 16 years | 25 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 0.745 | 1.379 | 54% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 3000 | 33% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 255M | 2.06T | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 1.09 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 10.63 | 14.80 | 72% |
| Returns for 3 years | 16.72 | 64.03 | 26% |
| Returns for 5 years | -30.55 | 68.23 | -45% |
| Returns for 10 years | -21.91 | 270.92 | -8% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers