Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
NMUCX vs VTSAX
NMUCX vs VTSAX Comparison
Open Charts NMUCX vs VTSAX
Neuberger Berman Multi-Cap Opp C
Price$10.61
Change-$0.17 (-1.58%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets252.64M
Vanguard Total Stock Mkt Idx Adm
Price$160.60
Change-$2.86 (-1.75%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets2.05T
NMUCX vs VTSAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
NMUCX vs. VTSAX commentary
Nov 14, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NMUCX is a Buy and VTSAX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
VTSAX has more cash in the bank: 2.05T vs. NMUCX (253M). VTSAX pays higher dividends than NMUCX: VTSAX (1.11) vs NMUCX (0.00). NMUCX was incepted earlier than VTSAX: NMUCX (16 years) vs VTSAX (25 years). NMUCX (2.00) is less costly to investors than VTSAX (0.04). NMUCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 25.00 vs. VTSAX (2.00). NMUCX has a lower initial minimum investment than VTSAX: NMUCX (1000) vs VTSAX (3000). VTSAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 11.52 vs. NMUCX (5.69). VTSAX return over 5 years is better than : 80.80 vs. NMUCX (-39.40).
| NMUCX | VTSAX | NMUCX / VTSAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 2.00 | 0.04 | 5,000% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.00 | 0.04 | 5,000% |
| Fund Existence | 16 years | 25 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 13.116 | 13.952 | 94% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 3000 | 33% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 253M | 2.05T | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 1.11 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 5.69 | 11.52 | 49% |
| Returns for 3 years | -7.47 | 66.89 | -11% |
| Returns for 5 years | -39.40 | 80.80 | -49% |
| Returns for 10 years | -32.10 | 225.71 | -14% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers