Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
NMUCX vs VFFSX
NMUCX vs VFFSX Comparison
Open Charts NMUCX vs VFFSX
Neuberger Berman Multi-Cap Opp C
Price$10.50
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets251.96M
Vanguard 500 Index Institutional Select
Price$317.85
Change-$0.97 (-0.30%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.37T
NMUCX vs VFFSX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
NMUCX vs. VFFSX commentary
Sep 08, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NMUCX is a Buy and VFFSX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
VFFSX has more cash in the bank: 1.37T vs. NMUCX (252M). VFFSX pays higher dividends than NMUCX: VFFSX (1.18) vs NMUCX (0.00). NMUCX was incepted earlier than VFFSX: NMUCX (16 years) vs VFFSX (9 years). NMUCX (2.00) is less costly to investors than VFFSX (0.01). NMUCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 25.00 vs. VFFSX (2.00). NMUCX has a lower initial minimum investment than VFFSX: NMUCX (1000) vs VFFSX (5000000000). VFFSX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 17.87 vs. NMUCX (10.64). VFFSX return over 5 years is better than : 89.31 vs. NMUCX (-36.82).
| NMUCX | VFFSX | NMUCX / VFFSX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 2.00 | 0.01 | 20,000% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.00 | 0.01 | 20,000% |
| Fund Existence | 16 years | 9 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 10.178 | 10.485 | 97% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 5000000000 | 0% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 252M | 1.37T | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 1.18 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 10.64 | 17.87 | 60% |
| Returns for 3 years | -6.50 | 65.99 | -10% |
| Returns for 5 years | -36.82 | 89.31 | -41% |
| Returns for 10 years | -32.60 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement