Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
NMUAX vs VTSMX
NMUAX vs VTSMX Comparison
Open Charts NMUAX vs VTSMX
Neuberger Berman Multi-Cap Opp A
Price$11.19
Change+$0.05 (+0.45%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets250.05M
Vanguard Total Stock Mkt Idx I
Price$152.62
Change+$0.67 (+0.44%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.91T
NMUAX vs VTSMX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
NMUAX vs. VTSMX commentary
Jul 28, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NMUAX is a Buy and VTSMX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
VTSMX has more cash in the bank: 1.91T vs. NMUAX (250M). VTSMX pays higher dividends than NMUAX: VTSMX (1.12) vs NMUAX (0.00). NMUAX was incepted earlier than VTSMX: NMUAX (16 years) vs VTSMX (33 years). NMUAX (1.25) is less costly to investors than VTSMX (0.14). NMUAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 25.00 vs. VTSMX (2.00). NMUAX has a lower initial minimum investment than VTSMX: NMUAX (1000) vs VTSMX (3000). VTSMX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 17.75 vs. NMUAX (14.42). VTSMX return over 5 years is better than : 93.51 vs. NMUAX (-29.50).
| NMUAX | VTSMX | NMUAX / VTSMX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.25 | 0.14 | 893% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.25 | 0.14 | 893% |
| Fund Existence | 16 years | 33 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 9.384 | 8.287 | 113% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 3000 | 33% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 250M | 1.91T | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 1.12 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 14.42 | 17.75 | 81% |
| Returns for 3 years | -3.01 | 60.60 | -5% |
| Returns for 5 years | -29.50 | 93.51 | -32% |
| Returns for 10 years | -29.31 | 200.97 | -15% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers