Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
NMUAX vs VTSMX
NMUAX vs VTSMX Comparison
Open Charts NMUAX vs VTSMX
Neuberger Berman Multi-Cap Opp A
Price$10.49
Change-$0.11 (-1.04%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets239.09M
Vanguard Total Stock Mkt Idx I
Price$142.86
Change-$1.69 (-1.17%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.82T
NMUAX vs VTSMX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
NMUAX vs. VTSMX commentary
Jun 15, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NMUAX is a Buy and VTSMX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
VTSMX has more cash in the bank: 1.82T vs. NMUAX (239M). VTSMX pays higher dividends than NMUAX: VTSMX (1.18) vs NMUAX (0.00). NMUAX was incepted earlier than VTSMX: NMUAX (15 years) vs VTSMX (33 years). NMUAX (1.25) is less costly to investors than VTSMX (0.14). NMUAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 25.00 vs. VTSMX (2.00). NMUAX has a lower initial minimum investment than VTSMX: NMUAX (1000) vs VTSMX (3000). VTSMX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 10.06 vs. NMUAX (9.27). VTSMX return over 5 years is better than : 91.36 vs. NMUAX (-29.33).
| NMUAX | VTSMX | NMUAX / VTSMX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.25 | 0.14 | 893% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.25 | 0.14 | 893% |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 33 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 2.542 | 1.349 | 188% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 3000 | 33% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 239M | 1.82T | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 1.18 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 9.27 | 10.06 | 92% |
| Returns for 3 years | -4.09 | 57.59 | -7% |
| Returns for 5 years | -29.33 | 91.36 | -32% |
| Returns for 10 years | -34.96 | 178.92 | -20% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement