Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
NMUAX vs VTSMX
NMUAX vs VTSMX Comparison
Open Charts NMUAX vs VTSMX
Neuberger Berman Multi-Cap Opp A
Price$11.34
Change+$0.01 (+0.09%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets251.96M
Vanguard Total Stock Mkt Idx I
Price$155.50
Change-$0.31 (-0.20%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.95T
NMUAX vs VTSMX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
NMUAX vs. VTSMX commentary
Sep 07, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NMUAX is a Buy and VTSMX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
VTSMX has more cash in the bank: 1.95T vs. NMUAX (252M). VTSMX pays higher dividends than NMUAX: VTSMX (1.07) vs NMUAX (0.00). NMUAX was incepted earlier than VTSMX: NMUAX (16 years) vs VTSMX (33 years). NMUAX (1.25) is less costly to investors than VTSMX (0.14). NMUAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 25.00 vs. VTSMX (2.00). NMUAX has a lower initial minimum investment than VTSMX: NMUAX (1000) vs VTSMX (3000). VTSMX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 18.03 vs. NMUAX (11.74). VTSMX return over 5 years is better than : 84.94 vs. NMUAX (-32.33).
| NMUAX | VTSMX | NMUAX / VTSMX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.25 | 0.14 | 893% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.25 | 0.14 | 893% |
| Fund Existence | 16 years | 33 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 10.753 | 10.330 | 104% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 3000 | 33% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 252M | 1.95T | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 1.07 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 11.74 | 18.03 | 65% |
| Returns for 3 years | -2.13 | 63.63 | -3% |
| Returns for 5 years | -32.33 | 84.94 | -38% |
| Returns for 10 years | -25.12 | 224.15 | -11% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement