Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
NMUAX vs VTSMX
NMUAX vs VTSMX Comparison
Open Charts NMUAX vs VTSMX
Neuberger Berman Multi-Cap Opp A
Price$11.03
Change+$0.10 (+0.91%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets248.78M
Vanguard Total Stock Mkt Idx I
Price$149.99
Change+$1.28 (+0.86%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.82T
NMUAX vs VTSMX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
NMUAX vs. VTSMX commentary
Jul 07, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NMUAX is a Buy and VTSMX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
VTSMX has more cash in the bank: 1.82T vs. NMUAX (249M). VTSMX pays higher dividends than NMUAX: VTSMX (1.12) vs NMUAX (0.00). NMUAX was incepted earlier than VTSMX: NMUAX (16 years) vs VTSMX (33 years). NMUAX (1.25) is less costly to investors than VTSMX (0.14). NMUAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 25.00 vs. VTSMX (2.00). NMUAX has a lower initial minimum investment than VTSMX: NMUAX (1000) vs VTSMX (3000). VTSMX (13.89) and NMUAX (13.24) have marching annual gain over last year. VTSMX return over 5 years is better than : 95.59 vs. NMUAX (-27.17).
| NMUAX | VTSMX | NMUAX / VTSMX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.25 | 0.14 | 893% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.25 | 0.14 | 893% |
| Fund Existence | 16 years | 33 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 7.820 | 6.421 | 122% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 3000 | 33% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 249M | 1.82T | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 1.12 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 13.24 | 13.89 | 95% |
| Returns for 3 years | -1.49 | 62.08 | -2% |
| Returns for 5 years | -27.17 | 95.59 | -28% |
| Returns for 10 years | -30.05 | 198.05 | -15% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement