Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
NMUAX vs VTSAX
NMUAX vs VTSAX Comparison
Open Charts NMUAX vs VTSAX
Neuberger Berman Multi-Cap Opp A
Price$11.49
Change+$0.06 (+0.52%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets252.61M
Vanguard Total Stock Mkt Idx Adm
Price$159.25
Change+$1.00 (+0.63%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.95T
NMUAX vs VTSAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
NMUAX vs. VTSAX commentary
Sep 27, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NMUAX is a Buy and VTSAX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
VTSAX has more cash in the bank: 1.95T vs. NMUAX (253M). VTSAX pays higher dividends than NMUAX: VTSAX (1.16) vs NMUAX (0.00). NMUAX was incepted earlier than VTSAX: NMUAX (16 years) vs VTSAX (25 years). NMUAX (1.25) is less costly to investors than VTSAX (0.04). NMUAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 25.00 vs. VTSAX (2.00). NMUAX has a lower initial minimum investment than VTSAX: NMUAX (1000) vs VTSAX (3000). VTSAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 15.64 vs. NMUAX (8.91). VTSAX return over 5 years is better than : 96.61 vs. NMUAX (-29.09).
| NMUAX | VTSAX | NMUAX / VTSAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.25 | 0.04 | 3,125% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.25 | 0.04 | 3,125% |
| Fund Existence | 16 years | 25 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 12.317 | 12.971 | 95% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 3000 | 33% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 253M | 1.95T | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 1.16 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 8.91 | 15.64 | 57% |
| Returns for 3 years | 7.11 | 80.33 | 9% |
| Returns for 5 years | -29.09 | 96.61 | -30% |
| Returns for 10 years | -19.90 | 250.82 | -8% |