Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
NMUAX vs VITSX
NMUAX vs VITSX Comparison
Open Charts NMUAX vs VITSX
Neuberger Berman Multi-Cap Opp A
Price$11.73
Change+$0.04 (+0.34%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets251.07M
Vanguard Total Stock Market Idx I
Price$163.84
Change+$0.68 (+0.42%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets2.05T
NMUAX vs VITSX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
NMUAX vs. VITSX commentary
Dec 04, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NMUAX is a StrongBuy and VITSX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
VITSX has more cash in the bank: 2.05T vs. NMUAX (251M). VITSX pays higher dividends than NMUAX: VITSX (1.11) vs NMUAX (0.00). NMUAX was incepted earlier than VITSX: NMUAX (16 years) vs VITSX (28 years). NMUAX (1.25) is less costly to investors than VITSX (0.03). NMUAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 25.00 vs. VITSX (2.00). NMUAX has a lower initial minimum investment than VITSX: NMUAX (1000) vs VITSX (5000000). VITSX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 11.44 vs. NMUAX (5.42). VITSX return over 5 years is better than : 77.22 vs. NMUAX (-36.90).
| NMUAX | VITSX | NMUAX / VITSX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.25 | 0.03 | 4,167% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.25 | 0.03 | 4,167% |
| Fund Existence | 16 years | 28 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 14.174 | 15.512 | 91% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 5000000 | 0% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 251M | 2.05T | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 1.11 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 5.42 | 11.44 | 47% |
| Returns for 3 years | -5.93 | 64.45 | -9% |
| Returns for 5 years | -36.90 | 77.22 | -48% |
| Returns for 10 years | -26.26 | 223.65 | -12% |