Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
NMUAX vs VITSX
NMUAX vs VITSX Comparison
Open Charts NMUAX vs VITSX
Neuberger Berman Multi-Cap Opp A
Price$11.19
Change+$0.05 (+0.45%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets250.05M
Vanguard Total Stock Market Idx I
Price$152.68
Change+$0.67 (+0.44%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.91T
NMUAX vs VITSX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
NMUAX vs. VITSX commentary
Jul 28, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NMUAX is a Buy and VITSX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
VITSX has more cash in the bank: 1.91T vs. NMUAX (250M). VITSX pays higher dividends than NMUAX: VITSX (1.22) vs NMUAX (0.00). NMUAX was incepted earlier than VITSX: NMUAX (16 years) vs VITSX (28 years). NMUAX (1.25) is less costly to investors than VITSX (0.03). NMUAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 25.00 vs. VITSX (2.00). NMUAX has a lower initial minimum investment than VITSX: NMUAX (1000) vs VITSX (5000000). VITSX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 17.76 vs. NMUAX (14.42). VITSX return over 5 years is better than : 93.55 vs. NMUAX (-29.50).
| NMUAX | VITSX | NMUAX / VITSX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.25 | 0.03 | 4,167% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.25 | 0.03 | 4,167% |
| Fund Existence | 16 years | 28 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 9.384 | 8.295 | 113% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 5000000 | 0% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 250M | 1.91T | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 1.22 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 14.42 | 17.76 | 81% |
| Returns for 3 years | -3.01 | 60.63 | -5% |
| Returns for 5 years | -29.50 | 93.55 | -32% |
| Returns for 10 years | -29.31 | 201.65 | -15% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers